Co-produced evidence-based recommendations for cascade screening and secondary prevention in the relatives of people diagnosed with non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease

Objective: Over 80% of Thoracic Aortic Disease (TAD) is Non-Syndromic (NS-TAD). However, existing evidence-based guidelines on screening, and secondary prevention are extrapolated from studies in Syndromic-TAD. People with NS-TAD experience unwarranted variation in care. We co-produced evidence-based guidelines for NS-TAD with a view to standardising screening and prevention and identifying gaps in knowledge for future research. Methods: Using a co-production approach, research questions were defined and ranking using a modified Delphi Process. Evidence based treatment guidelines were developed based on systematic literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and consensus, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve research questions were selected. Searches screened 7,115 references and identified 121 relevant studies. No studies were identified for 5 questions, so only 7 were subjected to the GRADE synthesis. A strong recommendation was made for routine imaging of all first-degree relatives with NS-TAD. Conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for cascade screening in first- and second-degree relatives, the routine use of combined genetic and imaging for screening, whole exome sequencing over gene panels, and the application of Decision Support Tools to enable shared decision making about cascade screening in families. Research recommendations were made for the comparison of MRI vs. transthoracic echocardiography for cascade screening, and the management of NS-TAD in pregnancy. For secondary prevention, conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for ARBs and Beta Blockers in NS-TAD. Conclusions: Care of people with NS-TAD is guided by Low certainty evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1724843
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-produced evidence-based recommendations for cascade screening and secondary prevention in the relatives of people diagnosed with non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease

Emma Hope, Joanne Miksza, Lisa D. Skinner, Julian Barwell et al.
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Co-produced evidence-based recommendations for cascade screening and secondary prevention in the relatives of people diagnosed with non-syndromic thoracic aortic disease

Emma Hope, Joanne Miksza, Lisa D. Skinner, Julian Barwell, Matthew J. Bown, John Maltby, G.J. McManus, Simon Oczkowski, Haleema Saadia, Nadeem Qureshi, Una Ahearn, N. Shannon, L. Ghosh, A. Oo, J. C. Dionne, G. Krasopoulos, G. Owens, A. Cotton, R. Grant, R. Proietti, R. Kaur, J. Elefteriades, G. J. Murphy, D. Cameron, R. Sayers, M. Lewis, S. Page, P. Clift, K. Hewitt, R. G. Abbasciano, H. Aujla
article en

Abstract

Objective: Over 80% of Thoracic Aortic Disease (TAD) is Non-Syndromic (NS-TAD). However, existing evidence-based guidelines on screening, and secondary prevention are extrapolated from studies in Syndromic-TAD. People with NS-TAD experience unwarranted variation in care. We co-produced evidence-based guidelines for NS-TAD with a view to standardising screening and prevention and identifying gaps in knowledge for future research. Methods: Using a co-production approach, research questions were defined and ranking using a modified Delphi Process. Evidence based treatment guidelines were developed based on systematic literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and consensus, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Twelve research questions were selected. Searches screened 7,115 references and identified 121 relevant studies. No studies were identified for 5 questions, so only 7 were subjected to the GRADE synthesis. A strong recommendation was made for routine imaging of all first-degree relatives with NS-TAD. Conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for cascade screening in first- and second-degree relatives, the routine use of combined genetic and imaging for screening, whole exome sequencing over gene panels, and the application of Decision Support Tools to enable shared decision making about cascade screening in families. Research recommendations were made for the comparison of MRI vs. transthoracic echocardiography for cascade screening, and the management of NS-TAD in pregnancy. For secondary prevention, conditional recommendations with low or very low certainty evidence were made for ARBs and Beta Blockers in NS-TAD. Conclusions: Care of people with NS-TAD is guided by Low certainty evidence.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
St Bartholomew's Hospital (GB), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), University of Liverpool (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), University of Leicester (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), Yale University (US), Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (GB), Essex Cardiothoracic Centre (GB), Health Awareness (United States) (US), NIHR Nottingham Hearing Biomedical Research Unit (GB), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Johns Hopkins Hospital (US), McMaster University (CA)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Department of Health and Social Care
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.