How to Identify Type 2 Chronic Rhinosinusitis in East Asian Patients

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease with distinct inflammatory endotypes, among which eosinophilic CRS (ECRS)-a category that substantially overlaps with, but is not equivalent to, Type 2 CRS-is associated with severe symptoms, frequent recurrence, and comorbid asthma. Accurate identification of Type 2 CRS has become clinically essential with the emergence of biologic therapies that target Type 2 inflammatory pathways. However, most diagnostic criteria, including those proposed by European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS 2020), were developed from Western populations, in which ECRS with nasal polyps predominates. This review critically examines the applicability of these criteria in Asian populations, in which non-eosinophilic and mixed inflammatory endotypes remain prevalent. Evidence from Korean and Japanese cohorts indicates that the EPOS 2020 Type 2 criteria have poor specificity in Asian patients with CRS with nasal polyps, classifying nearly all such patients as Type 2 because of differences in baseline biomarker distributions. We discuss histological thresholds for defining ECRS and highlight that Asian studies support higher tissue eosinophil cut-offs, approximately 70 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF) or around 10% of total inflammatory cells, compared with the 10 eosinophils per HPF recommended by Western guidelines. This review also evaluates outpatient- friendly scoring systems, such as Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) and newly proposed Korean diagnostic criteria, as well as emerging machine-learning approaches for noninvasive prediction of ECRS. We conclude that clinicians in Asia should adopt regionally validated criteria that integrate histological, serological, and clinical parameters to accurately identify Type 2 CRS, optimize selection of biologic candidates, and improve prognostic counseling in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of rhinology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2026.00004
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Identify Type 2 Chronic Rhinosinusitis in East Asian Patients

Shin Hyuk Yoo, Ki‐Il Lee, Ji‐Hun Mo, Gwanghui Ryu et al.
Journal of rhinology
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

How to Identify Type 2 Chronic Rhinosinusitis in East Asian Patients

Shin Hyuk Yoo, Ki‐Il Lee, Ji‐Hun Mo, Gwanghui Ryu, Jun-Sang Bae
article en

Abstract

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is increasingly recognized as a heterogeneous disease with distinct inflammatory endotypes, among which eosinophilic CRS (ECRS)-a category that substantially overlaps with, but is not equivalent to, Type 2 CRS-is associated with severe symptoms, frequent recurrence, and comorbid asthma. Accurate identification of Type 2 CRS has become clinically essential with the emergence of biologic therapies that target Type 2 inflammatory pathways. However, most diagnostic criteria, including those proposed by European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 (EPOS 2020), were developed from Western populations, in which ECRS with nasal polyps predominates. This review critically examines the applicability of these criteria in Asian populations, in which non-eosinophilic and mixed inflammatory endotypes remain prevalent. Evidence from Korean and Japanese cohorts indicates that the EPOS 2020 Type 2 criteria have poor specificity in Asian patients with CRS with nasal polyps, classifying nearly all such patients as Type 2 because of differences in baseline biomarker distributions. We discuss histological thresholds for defining ECRS and highlight that Asian studies support higher tissue eosinophil cut-offs, approximately 70 eosinophils per high-power field (HPF) or around 10% of total inflammatory cells, compared with the 10 eosinophils per HPF recommended by Western guidelines. This review also evaluates outpatient- friendly scoring systems, such as Japanese Epidemiological Survey of Refractory Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis (JESREC) and newly proposed Korean diagnostic criteria, as well as emerging machine-learning approaches for noninvasive prediction of ECRS. We conclude that clinicians in Asia should adopt regionally validated criteria that integrate histological, serological, and clinical parameters to accurately identify Type 2 CRS, optimize selection of biologic candidates, and improve prognostic counseling in this population.

Journal of rhinologyVol. 33(1)
Konyang University (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR), Dankook University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Ministry of Education, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.