Impact of infection prevention and control on costs, quality, safety and health in long-term care facilities: a systematic review protocol

Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are high-risk environments for contracting healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) due to residents' vulnerability, close living conditions, and frequent interactions between residents and healthcare staff. HCAIs in LTCFs are preventable through infection prevention and control (IPC) clinical best practices. While prior research has demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of these measures in reducing infection rates, less is known about their cost, impact on quality of life, safety, and health outcomes for residents and healthcare professionals. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the impact of IPC measures on costs, quality of life, safety, and health outcomes among residents and healthcare professionals working in LTCFs. Methods: This systematic review protocol is registered in the Research Registry (reviewregistry1949) and follows the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review is grounded in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of infection control interventions and the World Health Organization Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework. Eligible studies will include quantitative designs conducted in LTCFs, published between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2026. Interventions of interest include IPC-related professional (e.g., infection preventionists, IPC nurses) roles and clinical best practices such as hand hygiene, environmental hygiene, screening, and basic and additional precautions. Outcomes will include measures of quality of life, safety, health, and costs. Economic outcomes will be assessed through cost-evaluation studies. Searches will be conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Data extraction will follow CHEERS guidelines for economic studies and STROBE guidelines for non-economic studies. Study quality will be assessed using the Drummond criteria and ROBINS-I guidelines. Monetary values will be standardized to 2025 Canadian dollars, with discounting and sensitivity analyses applied where appropriate. Expected results: This review will synthesize current evidence on the clinical, economic, and quality-related impacts of IPC measures roles in LTCFs, identifying effective and cost-efficient strategies as well as gaps in existing research. Conclusion: The findings of this review will provide policymakers, healthcare administrators, and clinicians with evidence-based insights to inform the design and implementation of efficient IPC programs in LTCFs, supporting improved resident outcomes, workforce safety, and sustainable use of healthcare resources. Systematic review registration: reviewregistry1949.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1784637
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of infection prevention and control on costs, quality, safety and health in long-term care facilities: a systematic review protocol

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Sonia Gull, Fatima El-Mousawi, Stéphanie Robins et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Impact of infection prevention and control on costs, quality, safety and health in long-term care facilities: a systematic review protocol

Jyoshma Preema Dsouza, Sonia Gull, Fatima El-Mousawi, Stéphanie Robins, Laurence Bernard, Eric Tchouaket, Annie Ménard
article en

Abstract

Background: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are high-risk environments for contracting healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) due to residents' vulnerability, close living conditions, and frequent interactions between residents and healthcare staff. HCAIs in LTCFs are preventable through infection prevention and control (IPC) clinical best practices. While prior research has demonstrated the clinical effectiveness of these measures in reducing infection rates, less is known about their cost, impact on quality of life, safety, and health outcomes for residents and healthcare professionals. Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to assess the impact of IPC measures on costs, quality of life, safety, and health outcomes among residents and healthcare professionals working in LTCFs. Methods: This systematic review protocol is registered in the Research Registry (reviewregistry1949) and follows the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The review is grounded in the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework of infection control interventions and the World Health Organization Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework. Eligible studies will include quantitative designs conducted in LTCFs, published between January 1, 2015, and January 1, 2026. Interventions of interest include IPC-related professional (e.g., infection preventionists, IPC nurses) roles and clinical best practices such as hand hygiene, environmental hygiene, screening, and basic and additional precautions. Outcomes will include measures of quality of life, safety, health, and costs. Economic outcomes will be assessed through cost-evaluation studies. Searches will be conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Data extraction will follow CHEERS guidelines for economic studies and STROBE guidelines for non-economic studies. Study quality will be assessed using the Drummond criteria and ROBINS-I guidelines. Monetary values will be standardized to 2025 Canadian dollars, with discounting and sensitivity analyses applied where appropriate. Expected results: This review will synthesize current evidence on the clinical, economic, and quality-related impacts of IPC measures roles in LTCFs, identifying effective and cost-efficient strategies as well as gaps in existing research. Conclusion: The findings of this review will provide policymakers, healthcare administrators, and clinicians with evidence-based insights to inform the design and implementation of efficient IPC programs in LTCFs, supporting improved resident outcomes, workforce safety, and sustainable use of healthcare resources. Systematic review registration: reviewregistry1949.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
University of Luxembourg (LU), Université du Québec en Outaouais (CA), Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology (LU), Université de Montréal (CA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.