Impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on the postoperative outcomes in cancer patients: a literature review

Background: Growing evidence suggests that perioperative anesthesia management may influence long-term oncologic outcomes. This review synthesizes the existing evidence on the impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on postoperative immunity, recurrence, and survival in cancer patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2000 to October 2025. Keywords included combinations of "anesthesia," "anesthetic," "cancer," "oncology," "postoperative," "recurrence," "immunity," and "survival." Clinical trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses were included. Case reports and non-English studies were excluded. Results: < 0.01). However, conflicting evidence exists, with large retrospective and some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing no significant survival difference between TIVA and volatile anesthesia. Technological advances like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring and AI-driven analgesic algorithms promise personalized management. Conclusion: While preclinical and clinical data suggest that anesthetic strategy can modulate cancer-related outcomes, the evidence is heterogeneous. The observed benefits may be context-dependent, influenced by tumor type, surgical stress, and patient factors. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective RCTs with standardized endpoints to establish causal relationships and inform evidence-based, personalized anesthesia protocols for oncology patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1735369
Primary Topic
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on the postoperative outcomes in cancer patients: a literature review

Yong Ge, Tianzhi Chang, Yong Luan, Xiaochen Qi
Frontiers in Medicine
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
article

Impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on the postoperative outcomes in cancer patients: a literature review

Yong Ge, Tianzhi Chang, Yong Luan, Xiaochen Qi
article en

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence suggests that perioperative anesthesia management may influence long-term oncologic outcomes. This review synthesizes the existing evidence on the impact of anesthetic drugs and modalities on postoperative immunity, recurrence, and survival in cancer patients. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from January 2000 to October 2025. Keywords included combinations of "anesthesia," "anesthetic," "cancer," "oncology," "postoperative," "recurrence," "immunity," and "survival." Clinical trials, cohort studies, and meta-analyses were included. Case reports and non-English studies were excluded. Results: < 0.01). However, conflicting evidence exists, with large retrospective and some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing no significant survival difference between TIVA and volatile anesthesia. Technological advances like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring and AI-driven analgesic algorithms promise personalized management. Conclusion: While preclinical and clinical data suggest that anesthetic strategy can modulate cancer-related outcomes, the evidence is heterogeneous. The observed benefits may be context-dependent, influenced by tumor type, surgical stress, and patient factors. There is an urgent need for large-scale, prospective RCTs with standardized endpoints to establish causal relationships and inform evidence-based, personalized anesthesia protocols for oncology patients.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
Dalian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.