Evaluating coastal urban underground space for ecological and marine-pollution suitability using AHP–TOPSIS

An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process–TOPSIS framework is developed to evaluate the ecological and marine-pollution suitability of urban underground space (UUS) projects in coastal cities. The AHP–TOPSIS hybrid approach is particularly suitable for coastal infrastructure evaluation because it integrates structured expert judgement with transparent aggregation of distance-to-ideal performance, enabling balanced consideration of ecological, marine, technical, and social objectives in complex planning environments. A structured hierarchy of 10 criteria, grouped into Environmental/Marine, Economic/Technical, and Social/Governance dimensions, is weighted based on judgements from 50 experts in planning, underground engineering, coastal and marine environments, and infrastructure finance. Environmental/Marine factors receive the highest aggregate weight (0.53), ahead of Economic/Technical (0.25) and Social/Governance (0.22), with energy efficiency, air quality, stormwater management, marine impact, and lifecycle cost emerging as the most influential criteria. Five representative UUS alternatives—underground transit hub, subsurface retail complex, underground green park, multi-level underground parking, and subterranean mixed-use complex, are assessed using TOPSIS. The underground green park and transit hub have the highest closeness coefficients (0.72 and 0.65), while retail and parking options systematically underperform due to weaker Environmental/Marine and social profiles. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirm the robustness of the rankings to substantial variations in criteria weights, supporting the prioritisation of ecologically oriented and transit-supportive UUS concepts in coastal planning. The framework provides operational guidance for coastal planning authorities seeking to align investment in underground infrastructure with ecological resilience and long-term marine pollution mitigation objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-45750-4
Primary Topic
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating coastal urban underground space for ecological and marine-pollution suitability using AHP–TOPSIS

Guohui Wang, Ying Yang, Zhaoping Tian
Scientific Reports
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
article

Evaluating coastal urban underground space for ecological and marine-pollution suitability using AHP–TOPSIS

Guohui Wang, Ying Yang, Zhaoping Tian
article en

Abstract

An integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process–TOPSIS framework is developed to evaluate the ecological and marine-pollution suitability of urban underground space (UUS) projects in coastal cities. The AHP–TOPSIS hybrid approach is particularly suitable for coastal infrastructure evaluation because it integrates structured expert judgement with transparent aggregation of distance-to-ideal performance, enabling balanced consideration of ecological, marine, technical, and social objectives in complex planning environments. A structured hierarchy of 10 criteria, grouped into Environmental/Marine, Economic/Technical, and Social/Governance dimensions, is weighted based on judgements from 50 experts in planning, underground engineering, coastal and marine environments, and infrastructure finance. Environmental/Marine factors receive the highest aggregate weight (0.53), ahead of Economic/Technical (0.25) and Social/Governance (0.22), with energy efficiency, air quality, stormwater management, marine impact, and lifecycle cost emerging as the most influential criteria. Five representative UUS alternatives—underground transit hub, subsurface retail complex, underground green park, multi-level underground parking, and subterranean mixed-use complex, are assessed using TOPSIS. The underground green park and transit hub have the highest closeness coefficients (0.72 and 0.65), while retail and parking options systematically underperform due to weaker Environmental/Marine and social profiles. Sensitivity and scenario analyses confirm the robustness of the rankings to substantial variations in criteria weights, supporting the prioritisation of ecologically oriented and transit-supportive UUS concepts in coastal planning. The framework provides operational guidance for coastal planning authorities seeking to align investment in underground infrastructure with ecological resilience and long-term marine pollution mitigation objectives.

Scientific Reports
Zhejiang DongFang Vocational and Technical College (CN), Hangzhou Vocational and Technical College (CN)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Underground infrastructure and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.