Variation in reverse shoulder replacement surgery: A survey of UK shoulder surgeons

Background: Despite reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) being the predominant form of shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom, substantial variation exists in implant selection and surgical technique. This study aims to capture current RSR practice among members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Methods: A 24-question online survey was sent to BESS surgeon members in December 2024, assessing routine practice in both trauma and elective RSR. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: In total, 127 surgeons responded. Over half performed at least 20 RSRs annually (54.3%). The most common glenosphere sizes were 42 mm and 36 mm for male and female patients, respectively. Glenoid onlay components were used by 87.9% of respondents, and humeral inlay components by 55.6%. Most surgeons used symmetric liners (69.2%), a standard (50.0%) or short (48.4%) humeral stem, 10°-20° of humeral version (56.7%), and 135° (45.4%) or 145° neck-shaft angles (36.1%). Intraoperatively, 79.5% of surgeons routinely repaired the subscapularis, and metallic augments (70.9%) were the most used method of building offset. Preoperative planning was used by 67.7% of surgeons, while 7.9% used computer navigation. Discussion: This survey highlights variation in implant selection, operative technique, and technology use among UK surgeons, underscoring the need for evidence-based standardisation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Shoulder & Elbow
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732261437401
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in reverse shoulder replacement surgery: A survey of UK shoulder surgeons

Faheem Bhatti, Ananth Srinivasan, Puneet Monga, Aravind Desai et al.
Shoulder & Elbow
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Variation in reverse shoulder replacement surgery: A survey of UK shoulder surgeons

Faheem Bhatti, Ananth Srinivasan, Puneet Monga, Aravind Desai, Akhilesh Pradhan
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite reverse shoulder replacement (RSR) being the predominant form of shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom, substantial variation exists in implant selection and surgical technique. This study aims to capture current RSR practice among members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS). Methods: A 24-question online survey was sent to BESS surgeon members in December 2024, assessing routine practice in both trauma and elective RSR. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Results: In total, 127 surgeons responded. Over half performed at least 20 RSRs annually (54.3%). The most common glenosphere sizes were 42 mm and 36 mm for male and female patients, respectively. Glenoid onlay components were used by 87.9% of respondents, and humeral inlay components by 55.6%. Most surgeons used symmetric liners (69.2%), a standard (50.0%) or short (48.4%) humeral stem, 10°-20° of humeral version (56.7%), and 135° (45.4%) or 145° neck-shaft angles (36.1%). Intraoperatively, 79.5% of surgeons routinely repaired the subscapularis, and metallic augments (70.9%) were the most used method of building offset. Preoperative planning was used by 67.7% of surgeons, while 7.9% used computer navigation. Discussion: This survey highlights variation in implant selection, operative technique, and technology use among UK surgeons, underscoring the need for evidence-based standardisation.

Shoulder & Elbow
University of Leicester (GB), Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Diana Princess of Wales Hospital (GB), University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (GB), Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.