Regional Differences in Ionospheric Response Over East Asia During the 1–2 October 2002 Geomagnetic Storm

Abstract This study analyzes extensive ground‐based and space‐borne ionospheric data over East Asia during the geomagnetic storm of 1–2 October 2002, focusing on regional differences during the main and recovery phases. During the main phase, strong negative disturbances propagated from high to mid‐latitudes, affecting Northeast Asia near sunset, while prolonged southward interplanetary magnetic field Bz drove sustained prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) into mid‐ and low latitudes, producing local time (LT)‐dependent positive storm effects over China and Japan. However, PPEF did not consistently uplift hmF2 at magnetic latitudes 15–25°N. Rapid universal time (UT)‐and latitude‐dependent changes in downward diffusion led to complex responses: hmF2 at 15–20°N rose slightly and then declined nearly synchronously before recovering, whereas uplift occurred near 25°N. During the recovery phase, mid‐latitude Japan exhibited a strong negative storm effect, in contrast to a weak positive response at comparable latitudes in central and western China. ROCSAT‐1 observations show that the disturbance dynamo electric field displayed distinct UT–LT evolution, with a stronger westward component over the Japanese sector and an eastward component over eastern China. Simulations using the Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model reproduced the longitudinal gradient in electron density across East Asia. Diagnostic analysis indicates that the pronounced zonal gradient in total electron content is mainly controlled by longitudinal variations in the electric field, while chemical processes, neutral wind transport, and ambipolar diffusion play secondary roles. These results demonstrate marked regional variability in the East Asian ionosphere even under non‐extreme geomagnetic activity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ja034788
Primary Topic
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional Differences in Ionospheric Response Over East Asia During the 1–2 October 2002 Geomagnetic Storm

Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
article

Regional Differences in Ionospheric Response Over East Asia During the 1–2 October 2002 Geomagnetic Storm

article en

Abstract

Abstract This study analyzes extensive ground‐based and space‐borne ionospheric data over East Asia during the geomagnetic storm of 1–2 October 2002, focusing on regional differences during the main and recovery phases. During the main phase, strong negative disturbances propagated from high to mid‐latitudes, affecting Northeast Asia near sunset, while prolonged southward interplanetary magnetic field Bz drove sustained prompt penetration electric fields (PPEFs) into mid‐ and low latitudes, producing local time (LT)‐dependent positive storm effects over China and Japan. However, PPEF did not consistently uplift hmF2 at magnetic latitudes 15–25°N. Rapid universal time (UT)‐and latitude‐dependent changes in downward diffusion led to complex responses: hmF2 at 15–20°N rose slightly and then declined nearly synchronously before recovering, whereas uplift occurred near 25°N. During the recovery phase, mid‐latitude Japan exhibited a strong negative storm effect, in contrast to a weak positive response at comparable latitudes in central and western China. ROCSAT‐1 observations show that the disturbance dynamo electric field displayed distinct UT–LT evolution, with a stronger westward component over the Japanese sector and an eastward component over eastern China. Simulations using the Thermosphere Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model reproduced the longitudinal gradient in electron density across East Asia. Diagnostic analysis indicates that the pronounced zonal gradient in total electron content is mainly controlled by longitudinal variations in the electric field, while chemical processes, neutral wind transport, and ambipolar diffusion play secondary roles. These results demonstrate marked regional variability in the East Asian ionosphere even under non‐extreme geomagnetic activity.

Journal of Geophysical Research Space PhysicsVol. 131(4)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geology and Geophysics (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.