The influence of external finance and domestic investment on clean energy transitions for African urban and rural households

This study examines the determinants of household energy transition in 48 African countries (2000–2023), focusing on domestic investment and external finance roles. Employing a dual-method empirical framework, the analysis combines Driscoll and Kraay’s fixed/random effects estimators to address cross-sectional dependence and autocorrelation, alongside instrumental variable quantile regression (IVQR) to account for endogeneity and heterogeneous effects across quantiles. Disaggregating results by sub-region (Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA] and North Africa [NA]) and household type (rural and urban), the research reveals elaborate patterns in regional and residential disparities. Key findings reveal domestic investment, external debt, and official development assistance (ODA) as significant positive drivers of energy transition across urban and rural households in the full sample. However, sub-regional analysis highlights divergent impacts: external debt boosts transition in SSA but hinders it in NA, while ODA and domestic investment remain universally positive. Foreign direct investment (FDI) shows a positive but statistically insignificant effect overall, yet significantly supports rural households in NA. Remittances exhibit a negative influence, particularly in NA, where they impede both urban and rural transitions, while SSA shows marginal (statistically insignificant) contrasts between rural (positive) and urban (negative) households. IVQR results further underscore heterogeneous responses across quantiles, with rural/urban households and SSA/NA subpanels displaying varying sensitivities to financial drivers. These findings emphasise the need for regionally differentiated policies, blending targeted financial instruments with context-specific strategies to accelerate equitable energy transitions. The study advocates for recalibrating debt mechanisms in SSA, leveraging FDI for rural NA projects, and redirecting remittance flows, while addressing quantile-level disparities through adaptive financing frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03142-8
Primary Topic
Energy and Environment Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of external finance and domestic investment on clean energy transitions for African urban and rural households

Gildas Dohba Dinga, Gisele Mah
Discover Sustainability
Energy and Environment Impacts
article

The influence of external finance and domestic investment on clean energy transitions for African urban and rural households

Gildas Dohba Dinga, Gisele Mah
article en

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of household energy transition in 48 African countries (2000–2023), focusing on domestic investment and external finance roles. Employing a dual-method empirical framework, the analysis combines Driscoll and Kraay’s fixed/random effects estimators to address cross-sectional dependence and autocorrelation, alongside instrumental variable quantile regression (IVQR) to account for endogeneity and heterogeneous effects across quantiles. Disaggregating results by sub-region (Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA] and North Africa [NA]) and household type (rural and urban), the research reveals elaborate patterns in regional and residential disparities. Key findings reveal domestic investment, external debt, and official development assistance (ODA) as significant positive drivers of energy transition across urban and rural households in the full sample. However, sub-regional analysis highlights divergent impacts: external debt boosts transition in SSA but hinders it in NA, while ODA and domestic investment remain universally positive. Foreign direct investment (FDI) shows a positive but statistically insignificant effect overall, yet significantly supports rural households in NA. Remittances exhibit a negative influence, particularly in NA, where they impede both urban and rural transitions, while SSA shows marginal (statistically insignificant) contrasts between rural (positive) and urban (negative) households. IVQR results further underscore heterogeneous responses across quantiles, with rural/urban households and SSA/NA subpanels displaying varying sensitivities to financial drivers. These findings emphasise the need for regionally differentiated policies, blending targeted financial instruments with context-specific strategies to accelerate equitable energy transitions. The study advocates for recalibrating debt mechanisms in SSA, leveraging FDI for rural NA projects, and redirecting remittance flows, while addressing quantile-level disparities through adaptive financing frameworks.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 7(1)
North-West University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Energy and Environment Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The influence of external finance and domestic investment on clean energy transitions for African urban and rural households — Gildas Dohba Dinga, Gisele Mah · Discover Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS