Social exclusion, but not withdrawal, is diminished by a friend's level of acceptance: A provisions model

Using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model, a friend's level of peer acceptance on the stability of a child's social withdrawal and peer exclusion was assessed with a sample of 252 fifth- and sixth-grade girls and boys of European and North-African descent from lower- and upper-middle class neighborhoods in Montreal, Quebec, in 2015/2016. Sociometric choices at T1 were used to create 126 mutual friend dyads. Exclusion and withdrawal were measured at T1 and T2 with peer assessments, 8 weeks apart. Findings revealed that children who were highly excluded at T1 were relatively less excluded at T2 if their friend was highly accepted at T1 than if their friend was less accepted. These findings support the value of using provision indicators in studies of peer influence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/chidev/aacag036
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social exclusion, but not withdrawal, is diminished by a friend's level of acceptance: A provisions model

Melissa Commisso, William M Bukowski
Child Development
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Social exclusion, but not withdrawal, is diminished by a friend's level of acceptance: A provisions model

Melissa Commisso, William M Bukowski
article en

Abstract

Using the Actor-Partner-Interdependence Model, a friend's level of peer acceptance on the stability of a child's social withdrawal and peer exclusion was assessed with a sample of 252 fifth- and sixth-grade girls and boys of European and North-African descent from lower- and upper-middle class neighborhoods in Montreal, Quebec, in 2015/2016. Sociometric choices at T1 were used to create 126 mutual friend dyads. Exclusion and withdrawal were measured at T1 and T2 with peer assessments, 8 weeks apart. Findings revealed that children who were highly excluded at T1 were relatively less excluded at T2 if their friend was highly accepted at T1 than if their friend was less accepted. These findings support the value of using provision indicators in studies of peer influence.

Child Development
Concordia University (CA)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.