The effect of remimazolam versus propofol on respiratory depression for non-intubated general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the respiratory safety profiles of remimazolam versus propofol during non-intubated general anesthesia. METHODS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial investigated 200 female patients undergoing Open Excision of Benign Breast Nodule (OEBN) under non-intubated general anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance, combined with remifentanil. We employed the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale for continuous sedation monitoring. The primary endpoint was the incidence of respiratory depression. Secondary outcomes encompassed: postoperative recovery quality, sedation success rate, frequency of respiratory depression episodes, requirement for airway interventions, and occurrence of adverse events (including hemodynamic instability and procedure-related complications). RESULTS: Of 200 randomized participants, 173 completed all study procedures and were included in the final analysis (Group R: n = 87; Group P: n = 86). The remimazolam group exhibited superior respiratory safety profiles compared to the propofol group, with a lower incidence of respiratory depression (89.7% vs 97.7%, p = 0.031) and a significantly reduced requirement for airway interventions (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, remimazolam predominantly induces mild respiratory depression (73.6%), whereas propofol is more frequently associated with severe respiratory suppression (44.2%). Regarding adverse events, Group R demonstrated markedly lower rates of injection pain (0% vs 39.5%, p < 0.001), hypotension (29.9% vs 46.5%, p = 0.024), and bradycardia (18.4% vs 44.2%, p < 0.001). Patients receiving remimazolam (Group R) demonstrated significantly superior hemodynamic stability compared to the propofol group. CONCLUSION: Although both remimazolam and propofol demonstrated a high incidence of respiratory depression, remimazolam was associated with milder respiratory suppression and a reduced need for airway interventions during OEBN with non-intubated general anesthesia. Additionally, it offers better hemodynamic stability and fewer adverse events, making it a safer alternative for such procedures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089826.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Anesthesia
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-026-03722-y
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of remimazolam versus propofol on respiratory depression for non-intubated general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Congjie Bi, Wenhui Zhang, Yutao Chen, Naying Su et al.
Journal of Anesthesia
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

The effect of remimazolam versus propofol on respiratory depression for non-intubated general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

Congjie Bi, Wenhui Zhang, Yutao Chen, Naying Su, Siru Li, Di Wang, Chenxin Jiang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the respiratory safety profiles of remimazolam versus propofol during non-intubated general anesthesia. METHODS: This single-center, randomized controlled trial investigated 200 female patients undergoing Open Excision of Benign Breast Nodule (OEBN) under non-intubated general anesthesia. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance, combined with remifentanil. We employed the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale for continuous sedation monitoring. The primary endpoint was the incidence of respiratory depression. Secondary outcomes encompassed: postoperative recovery quality, sedation success rate, frequency of respiratory depression episodes, requirement for airway interventions, and occurrence of adverse events (including hemodynamic instability and procedure-related complications). RESULTS: Of 200 randomized participants, 173 completed all study procedures and were included in the final analysis (Group R: n = 87; Group P: n = 86). The remimazolam group exhibited superior respiratory safety profiles compared to the propofol group, with a lower incidence of respiratory depression (89.7% vs 97.7%, p = 0.031) and a significantly reduced requirement for airway interventions (all p < 0.05). Furthermore, remimazolam predominantly induces mild respiratory depression (73.6%), whereas propofol is more frequently associated with severe respiratory suppression (44.2%). Regarding adverse events, Group R demonstrated markedly lower rates of injection pain (0% vs 39.5%, p < 0.001), hypotension (29.9% vs 46.5%, p = 0.024), and bradycardia (18.4% vs 44.2%, p < 0.001). Patients receiving remimazolam (Group R) demonstrated significantly superior hemodynamic stability compared to the propofol group. CONCLUSION: Although both remimazolam and propofol demonstrated a high incidence of respiratory depression, remimazolam was associated with milder respiratory suppression and a reduced need for airway interventions during OEBN with non-intubated general anesthesia. Additionally, it offers better hemodynamic stability and fewer adverse events, making it a safer alternative for such procedures. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2400089826.

Journal of Anesthesia
Dalian Medical University (CN), Dalian University of Technology (CN), Dalian Municipal Central Hospital (CN), Zhoukou City Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.