Factors influencing obstetric ultrasound examination duration in a tertiary fetal center

Abstract Objective To quantify scan duration across commonly performed obstetric ultrasound examinations in a tertiary fetal imaging center and to evaluate whether exam type, maternal body mass index (BMI), and sonographer experience independently influence scan time. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing diagnostic obstetric ultrasound between January 2023 and May 2024 at a high‐volume tertiary care center. Ultrasounds were categorized into five exam types: dating/viability (6–10 weeks), detailed first‐trimester (11–14 weeks), detailed second‐trimester anatomic survey (18–22 weeks), fetal echocardiography (22–24 weeks), and second/third‐trimester growth/Doppler (24–38 weeks) scans. Scan duration was defined using ultrasound image timestamps from the first to the last acquired image. Linear regression models with log‐transformed duration were constructed, adjusting for ultrasound type, maternal BMI (per 10‐unit increase), prior abdominal surgery, and sonographer experience (0–4, 5–9, ≥10 years). Adjusted durations were estimated using marginal standardization. Results A total of 870 ultrasounds were analyzed. Median scan duration varied significantly by exam type: dating (6.8 min), detailed first‐trimester (18.3 min), second‐trimester anatomy survey (29.9 min), fetal echocardiography (26.6 min), and second/third‐trimester growth/Doppler (12.5 min) scans. After adjustment, all exam types required significantly longer scan times than dating ultrasounds, with the largest increases observed for second‐trimester anatomic surveys and fetal echocardiography ( p < 0.001). Greater sonographer experience was independently associated with shorter scan duration, with efficiency gains plateauing after approximately 5 years. Maternal BMI was also a significant predictor of scan duration, with each 10‐unit increase in BMI associated with an approximately 3% increase in adjusted scan time ( p = 0.037). Conclusion Scan duration in obstetric ultrasound is strongly influenced by exam type, sonographer experience, and maternal BMI. These findings provide clinically relevant information that can be used for the creation of benchmarks, scheduling templates, staffing strategies, and workflow optimization in maternal‐fetal medicine ultrasound units.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pregnancy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70285
Primary Topic
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing obstetric ultrasound examination duration in a tertiary fetal center

Salimah Navaz Gangji, Diana Aboukhater, Juliana Gevaerd Martins, T Kawakita et al.
Pregnancy
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
article

Factors influencing obstetric ultrasound examination duration in a tertiary fetal center

Salimah Navaz Gangji, Diana Aboukhater, Juliana Gevaerd Martins, T Kawakita, Alfred Abuhamad, Maya Vishna
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To quantify scan duration across commonly performed obstetric ultrasound examinations in a tertiary fetal imaging center and to evaluate whether exam type, maternal body mass index (BMI), and sonographer experience independently influence scan time. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies undergoing diagnostic obstetric ultrasound between January 2023 and May 2024 at a high‐volume tertiary care center. Ultrasounds were categorized into five exam types: dating/viability (6–10 weeks), detailed first‐trimester (11–14 weeks), detailed second‐trimester anatomic survey (18–22 weeks), fetal echocardiography (22–24 weeks), and second/third‐trimester growth/Doppler (24–38 weeks) scans. Scan duration was defined using ultrasound image timestamps from the first to the last acquired image. Linear regression models with log‐transformed duration were constructed, adjusting for ultrasound type, maternal BMI (per 10‐unit increase), prior abdominal surgery, and sonographer experience (0–4, 5–9, ≥10 years). Adjusted durations were estimated using marginal standardization. Results A total of 870 ultrasounds were analyzed. Median scan duration varied significantly by exam type: dating (6.8 min), detailed first‐trimester (18.3 min), second‐trimester anatomy survey (29.9 min), fetal echocardiography (26.6 min), and second/third‐trimester growth/Doppler (12.5 min) scans. After adjustment, all exam types required significantly longer scan times than dating ultrasounds, with the largest increases observed for second‐trimester anatomic surveys and fetal echocardiography ( p < 0.001). Greater sonographer experience was independently associated with shorter scan duration, with efficiency gains plateauing after approximately 5 years. Maternal BMI was also a significant predictor of scan duration, with each 10‐unit increase in BMI associated with an approximately 3% increase in adjusted scan time ( p = 0.037). Conclusion Scan duration in obstetric ultrasound is strongly influenced by exam type, sonographer experience, and maternal BMI. These findings provide clinically relevant information that can be used for the creation of benchmarks, scheduling templates, staffing strategies, and workflow optimization in maternal‐fetal medicine ultrasound units.

PregnancyVol. 2(3)
Old Dominion University (US), University of Toledo (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.