Governing Trade Conflict

As President Trump imposed high tariffs on China, his economic nationalism was framed as a break from the postwar liberal trade order. By examining U.S.–Japan trade relations under Carter, the article shows that the tension between free-market ideals and state intervention preceded the Trump administration. Drawing on archival materials from the Carter Presidency, the study analyzes how U.S. officials in the 1970s sought to manage trade imbalances and declining competitiveness while publicly disavowing protectionism. Situating this discourse in relation to the more overt trade confrontations of the Reagan era and Trump's unapologetic protectionism, the article argues that what distinguishes Trump is not state intervention but the erosion of the rhetorical and institutional balancing strategies that once contained it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
USAbroad – Journal of American History and Politics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2611-2752/22226
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing Trade Conflict

Patrick Nichols
USAbroad – Journal of American History and Politics
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

Governing Trade Conflict

Patrick Nichols
article en

Abstract

As President Trump imposed high tariffs on China, his economic nationalism was framed as a break from the postwar liberal trade order. By examining U.S.–Japan trade relations under Carter, the article shows that the tension between free-market ideals and state intervention preceded the Trump administration. Drawing on archival materials from the Carter Presidency, the study analyzes how U.S. officials in the 1970s sought to manage trade imbalances and declining competitiveness while publicly disavowing protectionism. Situating this discourse in relation to the more overt trade confrontations of the Reagan era and Trump's unapologetic protectionism, the article argues that what distinguishes Trump is not state intervention but the erosion of the rhetorical and institutional balancing strategies that once contained it.

USAbroad – Journal of American History and PoliticsVol. 9
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.