The Impact of Interdisciplinary Protocols for Managing Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review Protocol

<ns7:p>Background Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is characterised by sudden onset, rapid progression, and exceptionally high mortality, making it significantly more life-threatening than cerebral infarction or malignant neoplasms. Despite advances in imaging and surgical techniques, many patients still do not receive timely and optimal care, particularly regarding the interval from emergency department (ED) arrival to surgery. Diagnostic delays, poor interdepartmental communication, and fragmented protocols are major contributors to treatment delay and adverse outcomes. Therefore, the development of an interdisciplinary protocol is essential to optimise diagnostic and therapeutic processes, shorten treatment time, and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to synthesise the evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of interdisciplinary protocols in improving clinical outcomes. Methods This protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261284772) and will be reported in line with the PRISMA-P guidelines. Searches of the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the PROSPERO register will be conducted to identify comparative study designs, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, and observational comparative studies (e.g. cohort and case-control studies), evaluating the effects of interdisciplinary protocols on clinical outcomes in patients with AAD. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. If sufficient clinical and methodological homogeneity is identified, a meta-analysis will be conducted; otherwise, the findings will be presented in a narrative synthesis. Conclusions This systematic review will explore the effects of interdisciplinary protocols for patients with AAD to inform best practice. The findings may inform future protocol development, particularly in the context of time-critical emergency care.</ns7:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HRB Open Research
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14370.1
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Interdisciplinary Protocols for Managing Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review Protocol

Catherine McCabe, Zhuming Bao, Louise Doyle, Philip Hardie et al.
HRB Open Research
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

The Impact of Interdisciplinary Protocols for Managing Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review Protocol

Catherine McCabe, Zhuming Bao, Louise Doyle, Philip Hardie, Yu YAN, Xuemei Gong
article en

Abstract

<ns7:p>Background Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is characterised by sudden onset, rapid progression, and exceptionally high mortality, making it significantly more life-threatening than cerebral infarction or malignant neoplasms. Despite advances in imaging and surgical techniques, many patients still do not receive timely and optimal care, particularly regarding the interval from emergency department (ED) arrival to surgery. Diagnostic delays, poor interdepartmental communication, and fragmented protocols are major contributors to treatment delay and adverse outcomes. Therefore, the development of an interdisciplinary protocol is essential to optimise diagnostic and therapeutic processes, shorten treatment time, and improve patient outcomes. This review aims to synthesise the evidence to evaluate the effectiveness of interdisciplinary protocols in improving clinical outcomes. Methods This protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD420261284772) and will be reported in line with the PRISMA-P guidelines. Searches of the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and the PROSPERO register will be conducted to identify comparative study designs, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, and observational comparative studies (e.g. cohort and case-control studies), evaluating the effects of interdisciplinary protocols on clinical outcomes in patients with AAD. Screening and data extraction will be conducted independently by two reviewers. The risk of bias of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. If sufficient clinical and methodological homogeneity is identified, a meta-analysis will be conducted; otherwise, the findings will be presented in a narrative synthesis. Conclusions This systematic review will explore the effects of interdisciplinary protocols for patients with AAD to inform best practice. The findings may inform future protocol development, particularly in the context of time-critical emergency care.</ns7:p>

HRB Open ResearchVol. 9
Trinity College Dublin (IE), University College Cork (IE)
Health Research Board
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.