How Regulation and Global Standing Shape Stock Market Co‐Movements: A <scp>G20</scp> Panel Study

ABSTRACT Motivated by post‐2020 fragmentation and underexplored institutional‐geopolitical drivers, we examine how regulatory quality (RQ) and global power (GP) shape stock‐market co‐movements across 17 G20 economies. We estimate time‐varying correlations via ADCC‐GARCH, construct a scaled correlation index, and apply panel ARDL. We find that higher RQ and stronger GP raise long‐run integration; effects appear conditional rather than purely additive. Results are robust to alternative openness proxies (trade vs. GDP). Our contributions are a unified RQ‐GP framework, a correlation index for integration monitoring, and policy‐relevant evidence on how institutional quality and geopolitical standing condition diversification and financial stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Finance
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.70073
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Regulation and Global Standing Shape Stock Market Co‐Movements: A G20 Panel Study

Rakesh Gupta, Sama Haddad, E. A. Selvanathan, Tarlok Singh
International Review of Finance
Market Dynamics and Volatility
article

How Regulation and Global Standing Shape Stock Market Co‐Movements: A G20 Panel Study

Rakesh Gupta, Sama Haddad, E. A. Selvanathan, Tarlok Singh
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Motivated by post‐2020 fragmentation and underexplored institutional‐geopolitical drivers, we examine how regulatory quality (RQ) and global power (GP) shape stock‐market co‐movements across 17 G20 economies. We estimate time‐varying correlations via ADCC‐GARCH, construct a scaled correlation index, and apply panel ARDL. We find that higher RQ and stronger GP raise long‐run integration; effects appear conditional rather than purely additive. Results are robust to alternative openness proxies (trade vs. GDP). Our contributions are a unified RQ‐GP framework, a correlation index for integration monitoring, and policy‐relevant evidence on how institutional quality and geopolitical standing condition diversification and financial stability.

International Review of FinanceVol. 26(2)
Griffith University (AU), University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (VN), Charles Darwin University (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.