Implementing a burns treatment protocol for paediatric patients in secondary hospital settings

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of a defined treatment protocol for burns treatment in paediatric patients, who are admitted to the paediatric department and are managed by paediatricians and paediatric nurse staff, without surgical consultations. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we analysed paediatric patients admitted to Hillel-Yaffe Medical Centre for partial-thickness burns from January 2019 to December 2023. The treatment protocol was established in May 2020. All patients admitted before were treated according to general surgical consultation. From May 2020, treatment was conducted according to the local protocol developed. Data were initially analysed using descriptive statistics, including year-over-year analysis, and further examined with the patient-level interrupted time-series method. RESULTS: Patient numbers increased from 13 during the 16 months prior to May 2020 to 139 during the 44 months thereafter, with non-opioid analgesic treatment extending from 0.7 to 2.7 days. Opioid usage declined from 2.5 doses per patient in 2020 to 0.24 in 2023 as non-opioid use rose. All patients received procedural sedation according to protocol, compared to no sedation (from any type) beforehand. Burn site infections declined from 38.4% to 25.1%, while transfers to the burn centre remained similar (7.6-8.6%), and caregiver treatment refusal decreased from 38.5% to 8.6%. Patient-level interrupted time-series analysis suggested immediate increases in opioid doses, procedural sedations, and length of stay at protocol implementation (all p < 0.08), but no significant change in burn-site infection rate (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04-6.05, p = 0.581). CONCLUSION: Treatment of paediatric patients with partial-thickness burns by paediatricians in secondary hospital settings is feasible with a defined protocol, resulting in marked increases in analgesic use, and the use of mechanical debridement and advanced dressing technology. There has been no rise in the need for burn centre transfers due to complications, and parental trust has increased, as evidenced by declining treatment refusals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Burns
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2026.107989
Primary Topic
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing a burns treatment protocol for paediatric patients in secondary hospital settings

Or Givol, Adi Klein, Rachel Anne Kornhaber, Erik Biroš et al.
Burns
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
article

Implementing a burns treatment protocol for paediatric patients in secondary hospital settings

Or Givol, Adi Klein, Rachel Anne Kornhaber, Erik Biroš, Michelle L. Cleary
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the impact of a defined treatment protocol for burns treatment in paediatric patients, who are admitted to the paediatric department and are managed by paediatricians and paediatric nurse staff, without surgical consultations. METHODS: Using a retrospective cohort design, we analysed paediatric patients admitted to Hillel-Yaffe Medical Centre for partial-thickness burns from January 2019 to December 2023. The treatment protocol was established in May 2020. All patients admitted before were treated according to general surgical consultation. From May 2020, treatment was conducted according to the local protocol developed. Data were initially analysed using descriptive statistics, including year-over-year analysis, and further examined with the patient-level interrupted time-series method. RESULTS: Patient numbers increased from 13 during the 16 months prior to May 2020 to 139 during the 44 months thereafter, with non-opioid analgesic treatment extending from 0.7 to 2.7 days. Opioid usage declined from 2.5 doses per patient in 2020 to 0.24 in 2023 as non-opioid use rose. All patients received procedural sedation according to protocol, compared to no sedation (from any type) beforehand. Burn site infections declined from 38.4% to 25.1%, while transfers to the burn centre remained similar (7.6-8.6%), and caregiver treatment refusal decreased from 38.5% to 8.6%. Patient-level interrupted time-series analysis suggested immediate increases in opioid doses, procedural sedations, and length of stay at protocol implementation (all p < 0.08), but no significant change in burn-site infection rate (adjusted OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04-6.05, p = 0.581). CONCLUSION: Treatment of paediatric patients with partial-thickness burns by paediatricians in secondary hospital settings is feasible with a defined protocol, resulting in marked increases in analgesic use, and the use of mechanical debridement and advanced dressing technology. There has been no rise in the need for burn centre transfers due to complications, and parental trust has increased, as evidenced by declining treatment refusals.

BurnsVol. 52(5)
Sheba Medical Center (IL), Townsville Hospital (AU), Hillel Yaffe Medical Center (IL), Rappaport Family Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences (IL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.