Comparative Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers on the Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Multicenter Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with an increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in previous observational studies. However, real-world evidence on the CDI risk of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), a newer class of acid suppressive agents, remains limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from 15 hospitals standardized to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model and integrated through Federated E-Health Big Data for Evidence Renovation Network. Patients newly prescribed P-CABs, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were included and the primary outcome was the occurrence of CDI. After 1:4 propensity score matching, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were then pooled across databases by meta-analysis. RESULTS: In the 1:4 matched cohorts, we identified 61,596 P-CAB users (mean follow-up, 72.6 ± 29.9 days) and 132,683 PPI users (74.9 ± 28.6 days), 42,794 P-CAB users (69.5 ± 32.4 days) and 89,415 H2RA users (69.9 ± 33.1 days), and 85,686 PPI users (71.1 ± 31.2 days) and 159,178 H2RA users (68.0 ± 33.8 days) across the 3 pairwise comparisons. The pooled HRs were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69-1.10) for P-CABs vs PPIs, 0.85 (0.64-1.12) for P-CABs vs H2RAs, and 1.13 (0.98-1.29) for PPIs vs H2RAs. Results were generally consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: In this cohort study, P-CAB use was not associated with a higher risk of CDI compared with PPIs or H2RAs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000004011
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers on the Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Kyoung Min Moon, Jie‐Hyun Kim, Shi Nae Yu, Seung-Jin Kwag et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

Comparative Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers on the Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Kyoung Min Moon, Jie‐Hyun Kim, Shi Nae Yu, Seung-Jin Kwag, Byeong Jun Song, Rae Woong Park, Jae Myung, Da Eun Hyeon, Sang Youl Rhee, Hang A Park, Ji Hyun Kim, Gyeongmin Lim, Chang Won Jeong, Woo Hyeon Yoo, Hyun-Soo Kim, Sunghee Park
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been associated with an increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in previous observational studies. However, real-world evidence on the CDI risk of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), a newer class of acid suppressive agents, remains limited. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from 15 hospitals standardized to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model and integrated through Federated E-Health Big Data for Evidence Renovation Network. Patients newly prescribed P-CABs, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), or histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were included and the primary outcome was the occurrence of CDI. After 1:4 propensity score matching, pairwise comparisons were conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were then pooled across databases by meta-analysis. RESULTS: In the 1:4 matched cohorts, we identified 61,596 P-CAB users (mean follow-up, 72.6 ± 29.9 days) and 132,683 PPI users (74.9 ± 28.6 days), 42,794 P-CAB users (69.5 ± 32.4 days) and 89,415 H2RA users (69.9 ± 33.1 days), and 85,686 PPI users (71.1 ± 31.2 days) and 159,178 H2RA users (68.0 ± 33.8 days) across the 3 pairwise comparisons. The pooled HRs were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.69-1.10) for P-CABs vs PPIs, 0.85 (0.64-1.12) for P-CABs vs H2RAs, and 1.13 (0.98-1.29) for PPIs vs H2RAs. Results were generally consistent across subgroup and sensitivity analyses. DISCUSSION: In this cohort study, P-CAB use was not associated with a higher risk of CDI compared with PPIs or H2RAs.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Kangwon National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Soonchunhyang University (KR), Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul (KR), Kyung Hee University (KR), Gyeongsang National University Hospital (KR), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), Ewha Womans University Medical Center (KR), Myongji Hospital (KR), Gangnam Severance Hospital (KR), Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (KR), Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong (KR), Chung-Ang University Hospital (KR), Ajou University (KR), Bucheon University (KR), Wonkwang University (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.