More than roots: revisiting Kantian elements in predictive processing

This paper explores recent suggestions of conceptual affinity between the Predictive Processing (PP) framework and Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. We argue that Kant’s layered cognitive architecture mirrors PP’s hierarchy, particularly in its top-down processing and active construction of experience. Furthermore, both frameworks endorse a version of internalism that emphasizes the mind’s representational mediation of reality rather than direct access to external objects. However, key differences remain, notably Kant’s emphasis on a priori constraints and conscious judgment, contrasted with PP’s probabilistic and subpersonal predictive mechanisms. By highlighting these convergences and tensions, we conclude that PP is not only largely compatible with Kantian themes but constitutes a contemporary variant of Kantianism, reanimating essential insights within a scientific framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Synthese
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-026-05522-z
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More than roots: revisiting Kantian elements in predictive processing

Valtteri Arstila, Hemmo Laiho
Synthese
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

More than roots: revisiting Kantian elements in predictive processing

Valtteri Arstila, Hemmo Laiho
article en

Abstract

This paper explores recent suggestions of conceptual affinity between the Predictive Processing (PP) framework and Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. We argue that Kant’s layered cognitive architecture mirrors PP’s hierarchy, particularly in its top-down processing and active construction of experience. Furthermore, both frameworks endorse a version of internalism that emphasizes the mind’s representational mediation of reality rather than direct access to external objects. However, key differences remain, notably Kant’s emphasis on a priori constraints and conscious judgment, contrasted with PP’s probabilistic and subpersonal predictive mechanisms. By highlighting these convergences and tensions, we conclude that PP is not only largely compatible with Kantian themes but constitutes a contemporary variant of Kantianism, reanimating essential insights within a scientific framework.

SyntheseVol. 207(4)
University of Turku (FI)
Turun Yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.