Random Material Point Method for Large-Deformation Analysis of 3D Pile-Reinforced Slopes with Spatially Variable Soils

Antislide piles are widely utilized for disaster prevention and slope stabilization. However, previous studies have often neglected the influence of pile design on both slope destabilization and postfailure mitigation, focusing predominantly on deterministic analyses aimed at increasing safety factors while inadequately addressing large deformations. To address this issue, this study adopts an Euler–Lagrange algorithm, integrating the spatial variability of three-dimensional (3D) soil parameters with the large-deformation random material point method (RMPM). The mitigation of landslide disasters is investigated for slopes reinforced with antislide piles at various spacings in 3D spatially heterogeneous soils, and the postfailure behavior of the slopes is quantitatively characterized. Results from 3D RMPM analyses, considering both self-instability and seismic-induced landslides, indicate that under uncertainty conditions, the runout distance of slopes reinforced with piles may exceed that of unreinforced slopes when pile spacing is inappropriate. In homogeneous soils, larger pile spacing is required, leading to more conservative mitigation designs. Under seismic loading, slopes with 3D spatial variability experience more severe damage at the identical pile spacing compared to homogeneous slopes, thereby reducing the effectiveness of antislide piles. These findings highlight the necessity of maintaining larger safety margins than those suggested by deterministic analyses to ensure the protection of surrounding infrastructure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/ajrua6.rueng-1872
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Random Material Point Method for Large-Deformation Analysis of 3D Pile-Reinforced Slopes with Spatially Variable Soils

Zhiping Deng, Min Pan, Cao Luo, Shui-Hua Jiang et al.
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
article

Random Material Point Method for Large-Deformation Analysis of 3D Pile-Reinforced Slopes with Spatially Variable Soils

Zhiping Deng, Min Pan, Cao Luo, Shui-Hua Jiang, Min Zhong, Jia-Yang You
article en

Abstract

Antislide piles are widely utilized for disaster prevention and slope stabilization. However, previous studies have often neglected the influence of pile design on both slope destabilization and postfailure mitigation, focusing predominantly on deterministic analyses aimed at increasing safety factors while inadequately addressing large deformations. To address this issue, this study adopts an Euler–Lagrange algorithm, integrating the spatial variability of three-dimensional (3D) soil parameters with the large-deformation random material point method (RMPM). The mitigation of landslide disasters is investigated for slopes reinforced with antislide piles at various spacings in 3D spatially heterogeneous soils, and the postfailure behavior of the slopes is quantitatively characterized. Results from 3D RMPM analyses, considering both self-instability and seismic-induced landslides, indicate that under uncertainty conditions, the runout distance of slopes reinforced with piles may exceed that of unreinforced slopes when pile spacing is inappropriate. In homogeneous soils, larger pile spacing is required, leading to more conservative mitigation designs. Under seismic loading, slopes with 3D spatial variability experience more severe damage at the identical pile spacing compared to homogeneous slopes, thereby reducing the effectiveness of antislide piles. These findings highlight the necessity of maintaining larger safety margins than those suggested by deterministic analyses to ensure the protection of surrounding infrastructure.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part A Civil EngineeringVol. 12(2)
Nanchang University (CN), North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.