Predictive performance precision analysis in medicine: identification of low-confidence predictions at patient and profile levels (MED3pa I)

OBJECTIVES: Artificial Intelligence models are increasingly used in health care, yet global performance metrics can mask variations in reliability across individual patients or subgroups with shared attributes, called patient profiles. This study introduces predictive performance precision analysis in medicine (MED3pa), a method that identifies when models are less reliable, allowing clinicians to better assess model limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We propose a framework that estimates predictive confidence using 3 combined approaches: individualized (IPC), aggregated (APC), and mixed predictive confidence (MPC). Individualized predictive confidence estimates confidence for each patient, APC assesses it across profiles, and MPC combines both. We evaluate our method on 4 datasets: 1 simulated, 2 public, and 1 private clinical dataset. Metrics by declaration rate curves show how performance changes when retaining only the most confident predictions, while interpretable decision trees reveal profiles with higher or lower model confidence. RESULTS: We demonstrate our method in internal, temporal, and external validation settings, as well as through a clinical example. In internal validation, limiting predictions to the 93% most confident cases improved sensitivity by 14.3% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve by 5.1%. In the clinical example, MED3pa identified a patient profile with high misclassification risk, demonstrating its potential for safer deployment. DISCUSSION: By identifying low-confidence predictions, our framework improves model reliability in clinical settings. It can be integrated into decision support systems to help clinicians make more informed decisions. Confidence thresholds help balance model performance with the proportion of patients for whom predictions are considered reliable. CONCLUSION: Better leveraging confidence in model predictions could improve reliability and trustworthiness, supporting safer and more effective use in health care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocag034
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive performance precision analysis in medicine: identification of low-confidence predictions at patient and profile levels (MED3pa I)

Félix Camirand Lemyre, Martin Vallières, Jean‐François Éthier, lyna Hiba Chikouche et al.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Predictive performance precision analysis in medicine: identification of low-confidence predictions at patient and profile levels (MED3pa I)

Félix Camirand Lemyre, Martin Vallières, Jean‐François Éthier, lyna Hiba Chikouche, Ludmila Amriou, Dan Poenaru
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Artificial Intelligence models are increasingly used in health care, yet global performance metrics can mask variations in reliability across individual patients or subgroups with shared attributes, called patient profiles. This study introduces predictive performance precision analysis in medicine (MED3pa), a method that identifies when models are less reliable, allowing clinicians to better assess model limitations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We propose a framework that estimates predictive confidence using 3 combined approaches: individualized (IPC), aggregated (APC), and mixed predictive confidence (MPC). Individualized predictive confidence estimates confidence for each patient, APC assesses it across profiles, and MPC combines both. We evaluate our method on 4 datasets: 1 simulated, 2 public, and 1 private clinical dataset. Metrics by declaration rate curves show how performance changes when retaining only the most confident predictions, while interpretable decision trees reveal profiles with higher or lower model confidence. RESULTS: We demonstrate our method in internal, temporal, and external validation settings, as well as through a clinical example. In internal validation, limiting predictions to the 93% most confident cases improved sensitivity by 14.3% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve by 5.1%. In the clinical example, MED3pa identified a patient profile with high misclassification risk, demonstrating its potential for safer deployment. DISCUSSION: By identifying low-confidence predictions, our framework improves model reliability in clinical settings. It can be integrated into decision support systems to help clinicians make more informed decisions. Confidence thresholds help balance model performance with the proportion of patients for whom predictions are considered reliable. CONCLUSION: Better leveraging confidence in model predictions could improve reliability and trustworthiness, supporting safer and more effective use in health care.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Montreal Children's Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), École Nationale Supérieure d'Informatique (DZ), McGill University (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.