Intensity-modulated radiotherapy/Volumetric modulated Arc therapy including four Brachytherapy fractions versus 3D conformal radiotherapy containing five Brachytherapy fractions in the treatment of cervical cancer

Definitive radiochemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy is standard for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Advanced techniques like intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have replaced 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). This study compares two institutional definitive radiotherapy treatment pathways implemented in different time periods: 3DCRT with five BT fractions and IMRT/VMAT with four BT fractions. This retrospective single-center study included 145 patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB3–IVA LACC treated during 2008–2023. Patients received 3DCRT+5BT (2008–2016; n = 77) or IMRT/VMAT+4BT (2017–2023; n = 68) with concurrent chemotherapy. Histopathological biopsies at final BT evaluated tumor response. Dosimetric parameters (HRCTV-D90–EQD2₍₁₀₎ and OAR-D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid) were analyzed. Endpoints included treatment duration, residual tumor, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. After a median follow-up of 60 months, no significant differences were seen in PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34–1.38, p = 0.285) or OS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17–1.29, p = 0.133). Histologically confirmed residual tumor rates were 22.1% (IMRT/VMAT+4BT) vs. 31.2% (3DCRT+5BT; p = 0.262). IMRT/VMAT+4BT patients more often completed therapy within 49 days (63.2% vs. 20.8%; p < 0.001). Median HRCTV D90 EQD2₍₁₀₎ was 85.3 Gy vs. 76.5 Gy (p < 0.001) in favor of IMRT/VMAT, while OAR doses remained within limits. IMRT/VMAT showed significantly fewer gastrointestinal, genitourinary, skin, and mucosal toxicities (all p < 0.05) and less systemic deterioration. In this era-based single-institution comparison of two treatment pathways, IMRT/VMAT+4BT achieved numerically better oncologic outcomes without reaching statistical significance. IMRT/VMAT+4BT showed improved target coverage, lower toxicity, and shorter treatment duration, within the context of an integrated regimen change over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02834-9
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy/Volumetric modulated Arc therapy including four Brachytherapy fractions versus 3D conformal radiotherapy containing five Brachytherapy fractions in the treatment of cervical cancer

Katharina Leitner, Sergej Skvortsov, J Rieker, A Zeimet et al.
Radiation Oncology
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy/Volumetric modulated Arc therapy including four Brachytherapy fractions versus 3D conformal radiotherapy containing five Brachytherapy fractions in the treatment of cervical cancer

Katharina Leitner, Sergej Skvortsov, J Rieker, A Zeimet, Ute Ganswindt, Christoph Ebner, Miriam Emmelheinz, Barin Feroz, R. Purtscheller, Magdalena Steinlechner, Christian Marth, Sarah Maier, Katharina Steger
article en

Abstract

Definitive radiochemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy is standard for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). Advanced techniques like intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) have replaced 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). This study compares two institutional definitive radiotherapy treatment pathways implemented in different time periods: 3DCRT with five BT fractions and IMRT/VMAT with four BT fractions. This retrospective single-center study included 145 patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB3–IVA LACC treated during 2008–2023. Patients received 3DCRT+5BT (2008–2016; n = 77) or IMRT/VMAT+4BT (2017–2023; n = 68) with concurrent chemotherapy. Histopathological biopsies at final BT evaluated tumor response. Dosimetric parameters (HRCTV-D90–EQD2₍₁₀₎ and OAR-D2cc for bladder, rectum, sigmoid) were analyzed. Endpoints included treatment duration, residual tumor, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. After a median follow-up of 60 months, no significant differences were seen in PFS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.34–1.38, p = 0.285) or OS (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17–1.29, p = 0.133). Histologically confirmed residual tumor rates were 22.1% (IMRT/VMAT+4BT) vs. 31.2% (3DCRT+5BT; p = 0.262). IMRT/VMAT+4BT patients more often completed therapy within 49 days (63.2% vs. 20.8%; p < 0.001). Median HRCTV D90 EQD2₍₁₀₎ was 85.3 Gy vs. 76.5 Gy (p < 0.001) in favor of IMRT/VMAT, while OAR doses remained within limits. IMRT/VMAT showed significantly fewer gastrointestinal, genitourinary, skin, and mucosal toxicities (all p < 0.05) and less systemic deterioration. In this era-based single-institution comparison of two treatment pathways, IMRT/VMAT+4BT achieved numerically better oncologic outcomes without reaching statistical significance. IMRT/VMAT+4BT showed improved target coverage, lower toxicity, and shorter treatment duration, within the context of an integrated regimen change over time.

Radiation OncologyVol. 21(1)
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.