The biological roots of political division: mapping the neural architecture of ideology and social influence

For a long time, political thought was shaped by the image of the “rational voter,” someone who calmly evaluates policies and candidates before making a choice. Research in political psychology has steadily challenged that picture. Even so, the biological and cognitive processes that shape political identities, susceptibility to misinformation, and emotional reactions to leaders are only now coming into sharper focus. This Collection brings together recent work that goes beyond self-report and draws on neuroimaging, computational modelling, and behavioral interventions to examine the architecture of the political mind. Across these studies, political behavior appears closely linked to basic sensory, affective, and cognitive processes. Here, we synthesize those contributions and argue that future progress in political neuroscience will depend on stronger predictive computational models. Rather than treating ideology as either fully rational or simply irrational, this perspective suggests that political beliefs often emerge from ordinary neural systems trying to cope with complexity, uncertainty, and threat.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40834-7
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The biological roots of political division: mapping the neural architecture of ideology and social influence

Leor Zmigrod, Dezso Nemeth
Scientific Reports
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

The biological roots of political division: mapping the neural architecture of ideology and social influence

Leor Zmigrod, Dezso Nemeth
article en

Abstract

For a long time, political thought was shaped by the image of the “rational voter,” someone who calmly evaluates policies and candidates before making a choice. Research in political psychology has steadily challenged that picture. Even so, the biological and cognitive processes that shape political identities, susceptibility to misinformation, and emotional reactions to leaders are only now coming into sharper focus. This Collection brings together recent work that goes beyond self-report and draws on neuroimaging, computational modelling, and behavioral interventions to examine the architecture of the political mind. Across these studies, political behavior appears closely linked to basic sensory, affective, and cognitive processes. Here, we synthesize those contributions and argue that future progress in political neuroscience will depend on stronger predictive computational models. Rather than treating ideology as either fully rational or simply irrational, this perspective suggests that political beliefs often emerge from ordinary neural systems trying to cope with complexity, uncertainty, and threat.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES), Inserm (FR), University of Cambridge (GB), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychology (HU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The biological roots of political division: mapping the neural architecture of ideology and social influence — Leor Zmigrod, Dezso Nemeth · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS