Sensemaking and discursive legitimacy of dark patterns in Indian digital markets

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how consumers make sense of dark patterns on e-commerce platforms and collectively negotiate the (il)legitimacy of manipulative design through sensemaking in online discourse. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts constructivist grounded theory and uses sensemaking as a sensitizing lens. Reddit threads in which users discuss their experience with dark patterns on Indian mobile apps form the empirical basis for this study. Iterative line-by-line focused and theoretical coding were used to inductively derive a bounded set of discursive response moves and thread-level discursive trajectories. Findings Analysis reveals a repertoire of eight response moves through which individual users make sense of dark patterns, often by invoking multiple moves within the same discussion. Thread-level analysis shows that collective sensemaking about dark patterns is seldom uniform and remains contested. Response moves combine into two prominent but contrasting discursive trajectories at a thread level: (a) problematization and escalation and (b) normalization and countering. The (il)legitimacy of dark patterns emerges as an outcome of these discursive trajectories. Originality/value Rather than treating dark patterns as merely unethical design or compliance violations, this study shows that users discursively negotiate the (il)legitimacy of dark patterns through a bounded repertoire of response moves that combine into discursive trajectories. These trajectories, in turn, stabilize or undermine particular interpretations. In doing so, the study extends sensemaking theorization to everyday digital discourse where plausibility, contestation and multi-vocality produce evaluative outcomes. These insights inform Information Systems scholarship by reframing user agency as publicly enacted stance-taking and by offering an observable lens on how ethics and governance concerns become amplified, diluted or normalized.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Systems and Information Technology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jsit-11-2025-0557
Primary Topic
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sensemaking and discursive legitimacy of dark patterns in Indian digital markets

Divya Sharma
Journal of Systems and Information Technology
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
article

Sensemaking and discursive legitimacy of dark patterns in Indian digital markets

Divya Sharma
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how consumers make sense of dark patterns on e-commerce platforms and collectively negotiate the (il)legitimacy of manipulative design through sensemaking in online discourse. Design/methodology/approach This research adopts constructivist grounded theory and uses sensemaking as a sensitizing lens. Reddit threads in which users discuss their experience with dark patterns on Indian mobile apps form the empirical basis for this study. Iterative line-by-line focused and theoretical coding were used to inductively derive a bounded set of discursive response moves and thread-level discursive trajectories. Findings Analysis reveals a repertoire of eight response moves through which individual users make sense of dark patterns, often by invoking multiple moves within the same discussion. Thread-level analysis shows that collective sensemaking about dark patterns is seldom uniform and remains contested. Response moves combine into two prominent but contrasting discursive trajectories at a thread level: (a) problematization and escalation and (b) normalization and countering. The (il)legitimacy of dark patterns emerges as an outcome of these discursive trajectories. Originality/value Rather than treating dark patterns as merely unethical design or compliance violations, this study shows that users discursively negotiate the (il)legitimacy of dark patterns through a bounded repertoire of response moves that combine into discursive trajectories. These trajectories, in turn, stabilize or undermine particular interpretations. In doing so, the study extends sensemaking theorization to everyday digital discourse where plausibility, contestation and multi-vocality produce evaluative outcomes. These insights inform Information Systems scholarship by reframing user agency as publicly enacted stance-taking and by offering an observable lens on how ethics and governance concerns become amplified, diluted or normalized.

Journal of Systems and Information Technology
Management Development Institute (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Information Systems Theories and Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.