Clinical Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanner for Tooth Shade Selection Compared With a Spectrophotometer and Visual Matching: A Comparative Study

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the performance of an intraoral scanner (Medit i700) for tooth shade selection by comparing it with a spectrophotometric reference device (VITA Easyshade) and visual observers, using VITA Classical and VITA 3D-Master shade guides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (48 right maxillary teeth: central incisor, canine, and first molar) were recruited from the fixed prosthodontics clinic. For each tooth, shade was recorded three times with Medit i700, three visual observers, and VITA Easyshade under standardized daylight conditions using both VITA Classical and VITA 3D-Master guides. Easyshade was used as the reference. Exact shade matching between each method and the reference was calculated as percentages. A secondary analysis focused on the value (brightness) component, assessing exact value match and value acceptability within ± 1 value level. Chi-square tests were applied to explore the influence of method, shade guide, and tooth type on value outcomes (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Exact shade matching was low for all methods and both shade guides. When only value was considered, agreement increased substantially: the intraoral scanner and visual observers achieved moderate exact value matches and high value acceptability (typically > 80% within ± 1 value level of the reference) across both shade guides. Chi-square analysis showed no significant differences in value performance between methods; however, shade guide type showed a significant effect on exact value matching, while value acceptability did not differ. In contrast, tooth type had a statistically significant influence on value outcomes, with higher agreement in molars (and, to a lesser extent, canines) than in incisors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this clinical study, the intraoral scanner Medit i700 did not provide sufficient accuracy for full shade selection, but showed high agreement for value determination. Intraoral scanners should be integrated with spectrophotometric and controlled visual assessment for shade matching in esthetic restorations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.70347
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanner for Tooth Shade Selection Compared With a Spectrophotometer and Visual Matching: A Comparative Study

Nabil Alhouri, Amr Sameer Baqleh
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Dental materials and restorations
article

Clinical Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanner for Tooth Shade Selection Compared With a Spectrophotometer and Visual Matching: A Comparative Study

Nabil Alhouri, Amr Sameer Baqleh
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the performance of an intraoral scanner (Medit i700) for tooth shade selection by comparing it with a spectrophotometric reference device (VITA Easyshade) and visual observers, using VITA Classical and VITA 3D-Master shade guides. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients (48 right maxillary teeth: central incisor, canine, and first molar) were recruited from the fixed prosthodontics clinic. For each tooth, shade was recorded three times with Medit i700, three visual observers, and VITA Easyshade under standardized daylight conditions using both VITA Classical and VITA 3D-Master guides. Easyshade was used as the reference. Exact shade matching between each method and the reference was calculated as percentages. A secondary analysis focused on the value (brightness) component, assessing exact value match and value acceptability within ± 1 value level. Chi-square tests were applied to explore the influence of method, shade guide, and tooth type on value outcomes (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Exact shade matching was low for all methods and both shade guides. When only value was considered, agreement increased substantially: the intraoral scanner and visual observers achieved moderate exact value matches and high value acceptability (typically > 80% within ± 1 value level of the reference) across both shade guides. Chi-square analysis showed no significant differences in value performance between methods; however, shade guide type showed a significant effect on exact value matching, while value acceptability did not differ. In contrast, tooth type had a statistically significant influence on value outcomes, with higher agreement in molars (and, to a lesser extent, canines) than in incisors (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this clinical study, the intraoral scanner Medit i700 did not provide sufficient accuracy for full shade selection, but showed high agreement for value determination. Intraoral scanners should be integrated with spectrophotometric and controlled visual assessment for shade matching in esthetic restorations.

Clinical and Experimental Dental ResearchVol. 12(2)
Damascus University (SY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Clinical Accuracy of an Intraoral Scanner for Tooth Shade Selection Compared With a Spectrophotometer and Visual Matching: A Comparative Study — Nabil Alhouri, Amr Sameer Baqleh · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS