Documentation of high blood pressure measurements in the emergency department: factors associated with discussion and comparison to other settings

Asymptomatic hypertension is common among emergency department (ED) patients. However, follow-up occurs infrequently. Because recognition of elevated readings is a prerequisite for referrals, we investigated the factors associated with the documentation of elevated BP measurements in provider notes. Electronic medical record (EMR) data from the University of Iowa Healthcare system were used to identify patients who had an outpatient ED, primary care, or urgent care visit with high BP (140/90 mmHg or greater) from 01 January 2017 through 31 December 2021 and no prior hypertension diagnosis. We measured whether clinical notes from each visit mentioned hypertension or high BP and modeled the probability of that event across visits in ED, urgent care, and primary care settings. Covariates included the busyness of the care setting at the time of the visit, patient demographics, visit vitals and diagnoses. We identified 13,777 distinct patients with 18,036 ED visits, 3564 urgent care visits, and 27,895 primary care visits. Patient BP was discussed in the notes for 27% of ED visits compared to 51% of visits for both primary and urgent care. High BP was more likely to be mentioned in ED visit notes when the visit included diagnoses indicating chest pain and during times when the ED was substantially less busy than normal. High BP was also more likely to be mentioned in notes of the ED for patients with any prior diagnosis code of nonhypertension-related elevated BP. High BP levels are frequently not discussed in clinical and discharge notes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-026-04325-x
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documentation of high blood pressure measurements in the emergency department: factors associated with discussion and comparison to other settings

Cole G. Chapman, Philip M. Polgreen, Brett Faine, Linnea A. Polgreen et al.
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Documentation of high blood pressure measurements in the emergency department: factors associated with discussion and comparison to other settings

Cole G. Chapman, Philip M. Polgreen, Brett Faine, Linnea A. Polgreen, David A. Talan, Barry L. Carter
article en

Abstract

Asymptomatic hypertension is common among emergency department (ED) patients. However, follow-up occurs infrequently. Because recognition of elevated readings is a prerequisite for referrals, we investigated the factors associated with the documentation of elevated BP measurements in provider notes. Electronic medical record (EMR) data from the University of Iowa Healthcare system were used to identify patients who had an outpatient ED, primary care, or urgent care visit with high BP (140/90 mmHg or greater) from 01 January 2017 through 31 December 2021 and no prior hypertension diagnosis. We measured whether clinical notes from each visit mentioned hypertension or high BP and modeled the probability of that event across visits in ED, urgent care, and primary care settings. Covariates included the busyness of the care setting at the time of the visit, patient demographics, visit vitals and diagnoses. We identified 13,777 distinct patients with 18,036 ED visits, 3564 urgent care visits, and 27,895 primary care visits. Patient BP was discussed in the notes for 27% of ED visits compared to 51% of visits for both primary and urgent care. High BP was more likely to be mentioned in ED visit notes when the visit included diagnoses indicating chest pain and during times when the ED was substantially less busy than normal. High BP was also more likely to be mentioned in notes of the ED for patients with any prior diagnosis code of nonhypertension-related elevated BP. High BP levels are frequently not discussed in clinical and discharge notes.

Internal and Emergency Medicine
University of Iowa (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.