Comparing Vulnerability to Adverse Events in Construction Processes Performed by Human–Robot Collaboration and Traditional Crews: A Case Study in Drywall Finishing

Construction projects are exposed to adverse events during their execution. Proactive planning around these events is challenging due to the complex resource interactions, constraints, and interdependencies. Although human–robot collaboration (HRC) has the potential to improve productivity, quality, and safety in construction, its overall impact on project vulnerability remains uncertain due to the new resource interactions, dependencies, and technical challenges it introduces. This paper aims to explore how the application of HRC in a subset of construction tasks, specifically in the drywall finishing process, affects the vulnerability of work processes to disruption under simulated adverse events. To evaluate the vulnerability of work processes, two metanetwork models of the drywall finishing process are developed using jobsite observations and worker interviews. The first model represents the traditional human-crew process, whereas the second model modifies this baseline to integrate a semiautomated robot named “Canvas” in an HRC application. These models link worker and robot, equipment, material, and task nodes together based on their required operational interdependencies, providing a means to analyze the functioning of the work process before and after simulated adverse events using social network analysis techniques. The results identify the conditions under which HRC in drywall finishing, and in some cases HRC more broadly, makes the work process more or less vulnerable to adverse events. For example, the absence of a specialized operator can prevent 37.5% of tasks from being completed, highlighting a key condition that increases vulnerability in HRC workflows. The findings of the research will aid project managers by enabling more resilient planning of HRC applications, as well as providing guidance to robotic manufacturers seeking to improve the integration of their systems on construction projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jcemd4.coeng-17631
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Vulnerability to Adverse Events in Construction Processes Performed by Human–Robot Collaboration and Traditional Crews: A Case Study in Drywall Finishing

Bryan Franz, Aladdin Alwisy, Mahya Sam
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Comparing Vulnerability to Adverse Events in Construction Processes Performed by Human–Robot Collaboration and Traditional Crews: A Case Study in Drywall Finishing

Bryan Franz, Aladdin Alwisy, Mahya Sam
article en

Abstract

Construction projects are exposed to adverse events during their execution. Proactive planning around these events is challenging due to the complex resource interactions, constraints, and interdependencies. Although human–robot collaboration (HRC) has the potential to improve productivity, quality, and safety in construction, its overall impact on project vulnerability remains uncertain due to the new resource interactions, dependencies, and technical challenges it introduces. This paper aims to explore how the application of HRC in a subset of construction tasks, specifically in the drywall finishing process, affects the vulnerability of work processes to disruption under simulated adverse events. To evaluate the vulnerability of work processes, two metanetwork models of the drywall finishing process are developed using jobsite observations and worker interviews. The first model represents the traditional human-crew process, whereas the second model modifies this baseline to integrate a semiautomated robot named “Canvas” in an HRC application. These models link worker and robot, equipment, material, and task nodes together based on their required operational interdependencies, providing a means to analyze the functioning of the work process before and after simulated adverse events using social network analysis techniques. The results identify the conditions under which HRC in drywall finishing, and in some cases HRC more broadly, makes the work process more or less vulnerable to adverse events. For example, the absence of a specialized operator can prevent 37.5% of tasks from being completed, highlighting a key condition that increases vulnerability in HRC workflows. The findings of the research will aid project managers by enabling more resilient planning of HRC applications, as well as providing guidance to robotic manufacturers seeking to improve the integration of their systems on construction projects.

Journal of Construction Engineering and ManagementVol. 152(6)
Florida International University (US), University of Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.