Geopolitical risk and firm’s informal financing: International evidence

Utilizing the substitution hypothesis and the economic model of trade credit as conceptual frameworks, we find that heightened geopolitical risk (GPR) correlates with an increase in firms’ access to informal financing (FAIF), accompanied by a decrease in supply of informal financing (FSIF) within an international context. Moreover, firms are net receivers of informal financing amid heightened GPR. These core findings persist even after controlling for other external uncertainties, using alternative proxies for firms’ informal financing decisions, applying a 1-year lag to GPR, and analysing a reduced sample. Furthermore, a firm’s nature of goods, the financing frictions, relationship-specific investments, internationalization level and a country’s creditor rights protection, financial openness and financial development levels play a significant role in the relationship between GPR and firms’ informal financing decisions. JEL Classification: F51, F34, G32, D81

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Management
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962261425901
Primary Topic
Working Capital and Financial Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geopolitical risk and firm’s informal financing: International evidence

Muhammad Yusuf Saleem, David Tan, Searat Ali
Australian Journal of Management
Working Capital and Financial Performance
article

Geopolitical risk and firm’s informal financing: International evidence

Muhammad Yusuf Saleem, David Tan, Searat Ali
article en

Abstract

Utilizing the substitution hypothesis and the economic model of trade credit as conceptual frameworks, we find that heightened geopolitical risk (GPR) correlates with an increase in firms’ access to informal financing (FAIF), accompanied by a decrease in supply of informal financing (FSIF) within an international context. Moreover, firms are net receivers of informal financing amid heightened GPR. These core findings persist even after controlling for other external uncertainties, using alternative proxies for firms’ informal financing decisions, applying a 1-year lag to GPR, and analysing a reduced sample. Furthermore, a firm’s nature of goods, the financing frictions, relationship-specific investments, internationalization level and a country’s creditor rights protection, financial openness and financial development levels play a significant role in the relationship between GPR and firms’ informal financing decisions. JEL Classification: F51, F34, G32, D81

Australian Journal of Management
University of Wollongong (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Working Capital and Financial Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.