Do international remittances promote formal insurance uptake in developing countries? Evidence from a dynamic panel model

We investigate whether international remittances influence formal insurance (life and non-life) uptake in 103 developing countries using panel data from 1990 to 2020 and the System Generalized Method of Moments estimation technique. While remittances are often viewed as informal insurance, our findings reveal a contrasting dynamic. Specifically, we find that remittances boost non-life insurance uptake but reduce life insurance demand. A further moderation effect analysis shows that the positive remittance-non-life insurance link is amplified by the prevalence of road accidents, natural disasters, and access to information; the link with life insurance is unaffected. These findings challenge the prevailing notion that remittances are mere household safety nets, highlighting their role in shaping formal insurance adoption, especially as a strategic response to climate change in developing countries. Our findings are robust to alternative estimation techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Change and Restructuring
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-026-09999-z
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do international remittances promote formal insurance uptake in developing countries? Evidence from a dynamic panel model

Kazuo Inaba, Emmanuel Umoru Haruna, Usman Alhassan
Economic Change and Restructuring
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Do international remittances promote formal insurance uptake in developing countries? Evidence from a dynamic panel model

Kazuo Inaba, Emmanuel Umoru Haruna, Usman Alhassan
article en

Abstract

We investigate whether international remittances influence formal insurance (life and non-life) uptake in 103 developing countries using panel data from 1990 to 2020 and the System Generalized Method of Moments estimation technique. While remittances are often viewed as informal insurance, our findings reveal a contrasting dynamic. Specifically, we find that remittances boost non-life insurance uptake but reduce life insurance demand. A further moderation effect analysis shows that the positive remittance-non-life insurance link is amplified by the prevalence of road accidents, natural disasters, and access to information; the link with life insurance is unaffected. These findings challenge the prevailing notion that remittances are mere household safety nets, highlighting their role in shaping formal insurance adoption, especially as a strategic response to climate change in developing countries. Our findings are robust to alternative estimation techniques.

Economic Change and RestructuringVol. 59(2)
Ritsumeikan University (JP), Kobe University (JP), Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Kindai University, Kanazawa University, Ritsumeikan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do international remittances promote formal insurance uptake in developing countries? Evidence from a dynamic panel model — Kazuo Inaba, Emmanuel Umoru Haruna, et al. · Economic Change and Restructuring (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS