Validation of the modified Pink Esthetic Scores for single implant esthetic evaluation using intraoral scanning data

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of esthetic evaluation using modified Pink Esthetic Scores (PES) criteria based on the intraoral scanning data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PES criteria were refined for esthetic assessment of implant-supported restorations using standardized scanning images. Compared to classic PES, the variables remained unchanged, while 0.5 and 1.5 intervals were added for subtle details. In addition, the assessment of esthetic variables was based on measurement and calculation of soft tissue features. Forty samples were included and independently evaluated according to the classic and modified criteria by three dentists with different levels of clinical experience with an interval of 2 months. RESULTS: The mean classic and modified PES were 9.28 ± 2.38 and 8.93 ± 2.12, respectively. The consistency between observers using the classic and modified PES criteria reached 0.790 and 0.856, respectively. The scores from the postgraduate student were significantly lower when evaluating the samples with the modified PES, while no significant difference could be observed for the two senior dentists. The alveolar process and soft-tissue texture were the only two variables with a significantly lower score when applying the modified PES. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PES served as a practical tool to decrease the discrepancy between multiple observers with different seniorities. Further automated tools are required to increase the efficiency of esthetic evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Prosthodontics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70124
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the modified Pink Esthetic Scores for single implant esthetic evaluation using intraoral scanning data

Chun Xu, L. Ye, Ziang Wu, Yaqin Wu et al.
Journal of Prosthodontics
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Validation of the modified Pink Esthetic Scores for single implant esthetic evaluation using intraoral scanning data

Chun Xu, L. Ye, Ziang Wu, Yaqin Wu, Xinbo Yu
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of esthetic evaluation using modified Pink Esthetic Scores (PES) criteria based on the intraoral scanning data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PES criteria were refined for esthetic assessment of implant-supported restorations using standardized scanning images. Compared to classic PES, the variables remained unchanged, while 0.5 and 1.5 intervals were added for subtle details. In addition, the assessment of esthetic variables was based on measurement and calculation of soft tissue features. Forty samples were included and independently evaluated according to the classic and modified criteria by three dentists with different levels of clinical experience with an interval of 2 months. RESULTS: The mean classic and modified PES were 9.28 ± 2.38 and 8.93 ± 2.12, respectively. The consistency between observers using the classic and modified PES criteria reached 0.790 and 0.856, respectively. The scores from the postgraduate student were significantly lower when evaluating the samples with the modified PES, while no significant difference could be observed for the two senior dentists. The alveolar process and soft-tissue texture were the only two variables with a significantly lower score when applying the modified PES. CONCLUSIONS: The modified PES served as a practical tool to decrease the discrepancy between multiple observers with different seniorities. Further automated tools are required to increase the efficiency of esthetic evaluation.

Journal of Prosthodontics
East China University of Science and Technology (CN), Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (CN), National Clinical Research (US)
Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.