Allergen regulations for non-prepacked foods in the food service sector: A global scoping review

• First global review maps 83 allergen laws for non-prepacked foods in foodservices. • Most laws in high-income countries; LMICs face gaps due to informal food markets. • Only 4 of 83 regulations require anaphylaxis action plans; most lack full management systems. • Digital delivery platforms rarely mandate real-time allergen info, risking consumer safety. • Calls for harmonized standards, LMIC support, and integrated allergen management systems. Food hypersensitivity is rising worldwide, with strict avoidance of specific foods currently the only effective strategy for affected individuals. Regulatory frameworks have been introduced to support allergic consumers; however, regulations addressing non-prepacked foods within the food service sector remain underexplored. This scoping review, conducted using an adapted PRISMA methodology, systematically mapped 83 regulatory documents relating to food allergen management in non-prepacked foods across various global jurisdictions. Five principal themes were extracted from the legislation: (1) Presence of Information About Allergenic Ingredients. (2) Presence of Information Requesting Consumers to Declare Their Allergies. (3) Training and Education of Food Business Operators or Staff. (4) Existence of an Action Plan in Case of Anaphylaxis. (5) Existence of Food Allergen Management System or Individualised Plans. Most regulatory initiatives were located in high-income countries, underscoring a marked deficit in protections within low- and middle-income settings. Despite recent improvements, critical gaps persist in regulatory coverage, enforcement, and equity, potentially limiting the protection available to vulnerable consumers. This review offers a comparative framework for international policy development and identifies priority areas for strengthening allergen management in food service environments. The findings are intended to inform policy-makers and guide future research aimed at improving safety, regulatory inclusivity, and equitable access for allergic consumers eating away from home.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Policy
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103083
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Allergen regulations for non-prepacked foods in the food service sector: A global scoping review

Diogo Thimóteo da Cunha, Jan Mei Soon, Mariana Scudeller Vicentini, Carolina Neves Freiria et al.
Food Policy
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Allergen regulations for non-prepacked foods in the food service sector: A global scoping review

Diogo Thimóteo da Cunha, Jan Mei Soon, Mariana Scudeller Vicentini, Carolina Neves Freiria, Lisa Marie Winnall, Han Wen, Iain Malcolm Ferris
article en

Abstract

• First global review maps 83 allergen laws for non-prepacked foods in foodservices. • Most laws in high-income countries; LMICs face gaps due to informal food markets. • Only 4 of 83 regulations require anaphylaxis action plans; most lack full management systems. • Digital delivery platforms rarely mandate real-time allergen info, risking consumer safety. • Calls for harmonized standards, LMIC support, and integrated allergen management systems. Food hypersensitivity is rising worldwide, with strict avoidance of specific foods currently the only effective strategy for affected individuals. Regulatory frameworks have been introduced to support allergic consumers; however, regulations addressing non-prepacked foods within the food service sector remain underexplored. This scoping review, conducted using an adapted PRISMA methodology, systematically mapped 83 regulatory documents relating to food allergen management in non-prepacked foods across various global jurisdictions. Five principal themes were extracted from the legislation: (1) Presence of Information About Allergenic Ingredients. (2) Presence of Information Requesting Consumers to Declare Their Allergies. (3) Training and Education of Food Business Operators or Staff. (4) Existence of an Action Plan in Case of Anaphylaxis. (5) Existence of Food Allergen Management System or Individualised Plans. Most regulatory initiatives were located in high-income countries, underscoring a marked deficit in protections within low- and middle-income settings. Despite recent improvements, critical gaps persist in regulatory coverage, enforcement, and equity, potentially limiting the protection available to vulnerable consumers. This review offers a comparative framework for international policy development and identifies priority areas for strengthening allergen management in food service environments. The findings are intended to inform policy-makers and guide future research aimed at improving safety, regulatory inclusivity, and equitable access for allergic consumers eating away from home.

Food PolicyVol. 140
University of North Texas (US), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), University of Lancashire (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.