On the Role of Reaction Current Distribution to Attain Competitive Solid‐State Batteries

ABSTRACT Competitive solid‐state batteries must allow for high areal loadings (> 5 mAh·cm −2 ) and fast charging rates (> 2 C). Nevertheless, current academic research mainly focuses on systems with smaller loadings and lower C‐rates. For established cell chemistries a focus shift is required when aiming toward practical application. Increasing the areal active material content and C‐rates is often accompanied by charge transport limitations in the electrodes. In this work, the role of reaction current distribution in composite electrodes is highlighted as solid‐state batteries advance toward higher areal loadings and charging rates. Using NCM‐argyrodite composites as a case study, we revisit Newman's porous electrode theory in the context of solid‐state batteries to rationalize composite electrode cycling performance. Further, operando high‐energy X‐ray diffraction is employed to track lithiation states of NCM across the electrode as a function of state of charge. The results reveal significant improvements in reaction current distribution, when employing faster conducting Li 5.5 PS 4.5 Cl 1.5 instead of conventional Li 6 PS 5 Cl, underscoring the need for fast lithium‐ion conductors to enable competitive solid‐state batteries. This work demonstrates the importance of precisely controlling electrode composition to balance ionic and electronic transport, ensuring homogeneous utilization of the active material and mitigating local strain and overcharging.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Angewandte Chemie
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.2890151
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Role of Reaction Current Distribution to Attain Competitive Solid‐State Batteries

Wolfgang G. Zeier, Erik Šimon, Tim Bernges, Karol Végsö et al.
Angewandte Chemie
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

On the Role of Reaction Current Distribution to Attain Competitive Solid‐State Batteries

Wolfgang G. Zeier, Erik Šimon, Tim Bernges, Karol Végsö, Johannes Härtel, Eva Schlautmann, Lukas Ketter, Poongodi Ayyanusamy, Peter Siffalovic
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Competitive solid‐state batteries must allow for high areal loadings (> 5 mAh·cm −2 ) and fast charging rates (> 2 C). Nevertheless, current academic research mainly focuses on systems with smaller loadings and lower C‐rates. For established cell chemistries a focus shift is required when aiming toward practical application. Increasing the areal active material content and C‐rates is often accompanied by charge transport limitations in the electrodes. In this work, the role of reaction current distribution in composite electrodes is highlighted as solid‐state batteries advance toward higher areal loadings and charging rates. Using NCM‐argyrodite composites as a case study, we revisit Newman's porous electrode theory in the context of solid‐state batteries to rationalize composite electrode cycling performance. Further, operando high‐energy X‐ray diffraction is employed to track lithiation states of NCM across the electrode as a function of state of charge. The results reveal significant improvements in reaction current distribution, when employing faster conducting Li 5.5 PS 4.5 Cl 1.5 instead of conventional Li 6 PS 5 Cl, underscoring the need for fast lithium‐ion conductors to enable competitive solid‐state batteries. This work demonstrates the importance of precisely controlling electrode composition to balance ionic and electronic transport, ensuring homogeneous utilization of the active material and mitigating local strain and overcharging.

Angewandte ChemieVol. 138(20)
Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), University of Münster (DE), Battery Park (US), Institute of Materials and Machine Mechanics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Centre for Advanced Material Application of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Helmholtz-Institute Münster (DE), Institute of Physics of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.