Practitioners’ Perceptions and Experiences of a Brief Joint Working Intervention Within the Offender Personality Disorder Community Pathway

This qualitative study explores practitioners’ perceptions and experiences of a brief joint working intervention within the Offender Personality Disorder community pathway. Ten practitioners were recruited through purposive sampling and took part in online semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes suggested that joint working helped probation practitioners to better understand the people they supervised and to develop new ways of working. Collaboration, responsive working, established relationships, and active engagement were highlighted as good practices. Challenges included power dynamics, probation practitioners’ fear and cynicism, limited timeframes, and external pressures. The study highlights the benefits of a relational approach to joint working and makes practice recommendations. This study was conducted by the Research Involving Service Users Excels (RISE) team. RISE was made up of people with lived experience of prison, probation, and forensic mental health systems, alongside National Health Service and probation employees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14999013261435642
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practitioners’ Perceptions and Experiences of a Brief Joint Working Intervention Within the Offender Personality Disorder Community Pathway

Rosie Rutherford, Rosie Cornwell, Dominique Cranstoun, Ashley Porter et al.
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

Practitioners’ Perceptions and Experiences of a Brief Joint Working Intervention Within the Offender Personality Disorder Community Pathway

Rosie Rutherford, Rosie Cornwell, Dominique Cranstoun, Ashley Porter, the RISE team
article en

Abstract

This qualitative study explores practitioners’ perceptions and experiences of a brief joint working intervention within the Offender Personality Disorder community pathway. Ten practitioners were recruited through purposive sampling and took part in online semi-structured interviews, which were analyzed using thematic analysis. Themes suggested that joint working helped probation practitioners to better understand the people they supervised and to develop new ways of working. Collaboration, responsive working, established relationships, and active engagement were highlighted as good practices. Challenges included power dynamics, probation practitioners’ fear and cynicism, limited timeframes, and external pressures. The study highlights the benefits of a relational approach to joint working and makes practice recommendations. This study was conducted by the Research Involving Service Users Excels (RISE) team. RISE was made up of people with lived experience of prison, probation, and forensic mental health systems, alongside National Health Service and probation employees.

International Journal of Forensic Mental HealthVol. 25(2)
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Practitioners’ Perceptions and Experiences of a Brief Joint Working Intervention Within the Offender Personality Disorder Community Pathway — Rosie Rutherford, Rosie Cornwell, et al. · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS