Second‐trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule‐out

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish a high-sensitivity, multimetabolite rule-out model for the development of preeclampsia (PE), prioritizing minimizing false negatives to exclude low-risk individuals from intensive surveillance confidently. METHODS: weeks of gestation, before the diagnosis of PE, from the BRISA (Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís) prenatal cohort. Participants were prospectively followed until delivery, and PE cases were diagnosed during follow-up. Among 1400 enrolled women, 940 delivered at our institution; 30 were later diagnosed with PE, and 28 were included in the metabolomics analysis. The control group encompassed 28 healthy women, matched for maternal age and body mass index. A targeted metabolomics approach analyzed a 41-metabolite panel using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Eight metabolites below the detection limit in ≥15% of samples were excluded. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, univariate analysis revealed lower methionine and glutamine concentrations and elevated threonine levels in the case group. Classification models based on the remaining 33 metabolites, using leave-one-out cross-validation, achieved 100% sensitivity but had limited specificity (21%). A reduced four-metabolite model maintained 100% sensitivity with 50% specificity, while our refined, best-performing six-metabolite model achieved 100% sensitivity and 61% specificity with a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Our models demonstrated considerable potential as diagnostic tools for ruling out PE, thereby reinforcing their future applicability in screening and monitoring strategies during gestation to improve clinical decision-making and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70983
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Second‐trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule‐out

Viviane Cunha Cardoso, Matthews Silva Martins, Valério Garrone Baraúna, Silvana Maria Quintana et al.
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Second‐trimester multimetabolite panel for early preeclampsia rule‐out

Viviane Cunha Cardoso, Matthews Silva Martins, Valério Garrone Baraúna, Silvana Maria Quintana, Julyane N. S. Kaihara, Ricardo Carvalho Cavalli, Diego Fortes Salgueiro, Valeria Cristina Sandrim
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish a high-sensitivity, multimetabolite rule-out model for the development of preeclampsia (PE), prioritizing minimizing false negatives to exclude low-risk individuals from intensive surveillance confidently. METHODS: weeks of gestation, before the diagnosis of PE, from the BRISA (Brazilian Ribeirão Preto and São Luís) prenatal cohort. Participants were prospectively followed until delivery, and PE cases were diagnosed during follow-up. Among 1400 enrolled women, 940 delivered at our institution; 30 were later diagnosed with PE, and 28 were included in the metabolomics analysis. The control group encompassed 28 healthy women, matched for maternal age and body mass index. A targeted metabolomics approach analyzed a 41-metabolite panel using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Eight metabolites below the detection limit in ≥15% of samples were excluded. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, univariate analysis revealed lower methionine and glutamine concentrations and elevated threonine levels in the case group. Classification models based on the remaining 33 metabolites, using leave-one-out cross-validation, achieved 100% sensitivity but had limited specificity (21%). A reduced four-metabolite model maintained 100% sensitivity with 50% specificity, while our refined, best-performing six-metabolite model achieved 100% sensitivity and 61% specificity with a negative predictive value of 100%. CONCLUSION: Our models demonstrated considerable potential as diagnostic tools for ruling out PE, thereby reinforcing their future applicability in screening and monitoring strategies during gestation to improve clinical decision-making and alleviate the burden on healthcare systems.

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Clinics Hospital of Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.