Effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery quality in thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Thoracoscopic surgery, while minimally invasive, is associated with significant postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and hemodynamic instability, which can impede recovery. Intravenous lidocaine has been proposed as a multimodal analgesic adjunct due to its potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on recovery outcomes in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in seven databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) from their inception to August 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous lidocaine versus saline placebo in thoracoscopic surgery. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores (VAS/NRS) and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters (MAP, HR), and Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251183680). Fifteen RCTs involving 1103 patients were included. Lidocaine significantly reduced pain scores at all time points (0–48 h), with peak effect at 2 h (MD = -1.68, P < 0.00001). PONV incidence was lower in the lidocaine group (OR: 0.42, P < 0.00001). Although not statistically significant, a trend toward reduced postoperative pulmonary complications was observed (OR: 0.82, P = 0.26). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption (MD: -92.10, P < 0.00001) and postoperative opioid use (MD: -0.64, P = 0.03) were significantly lower in the lidocaine group. Lidocaine also attenuated hemodynamic responses during intubation and extubation (MAP and HR, P < 0.00001) and improved QoR-40 scores (MD: 2.98, P = 0.003). Regarding safety, reported adverse events were minor and transient, but current evidence is insufficient to fully characterize the safety profile due to inconsistent monitoring and reporting across trials. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine enhances recovery after thoracoscopic surgery by improving analgesia, reducing PONV and opioid use, stabilizing hemodynamics, and promoting overall recovery quality. It should be considered within multimodal ERAS protocols. Further standardized RCTs are warranted to optimize dosing and assess long-term benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-03794-z
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery quality in thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dong Chen, Zhongquan Zhu, Jianbo He, Dong ling ZHAO
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on postoperative recovery quality in thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dong Chen, Zhongquan Zhu, Jianbo He, Dong ling ZHAO
article en

Abstract

Thoracoscopic surgery, while minimally invasive, is associated with significant postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, and hemodynamic instability, which can impede recovery. Intravenous lidocaine has been proposed as a multimodal analgesic adjunct due to its potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effects of perioperative intravenous lidocaine on recovery outcomes in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in seven databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library) from their inception to August 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intravenous lidocaine versus saline placebo in thoracoscopic surgery. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores (VAS/NRS) and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Secondary outcomes included postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC), intraoperative fentanyl consumption, postoperative opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters (MAP, HR), and Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD420251183680). Fifteen RCTs involving 1103 patients were included. Lidocaine significantly reduced pain scores at all time points (0–48 h), with peak effect at 2 h (MD = -1.68, P < 0.00001). PONV incidence was lower in the lidocaine group (OR: 0.42, P < 0.00001). Although not statistically significant, a trend toward reduced postoperative pulmonary complications was observed (OR: 0.82, P = 0.26). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption (MD: -92.10, P < 0.00001) and postoperative opioid use (MD: -0.64, P = 0.03) were significantly lower in the lidocaine group. Lidocaine also attenuated hemodynamic responses during intubation and extubation (MAP and HR, P < 0.00001) and improved QoR-40 scores (MD: 2.98, P = 0.003). Regarding safety, reported adverse events were minor and transient, but current evidence is insufficient to fully characterize the safety profile due to inconsistent monitoring and reporting across trials. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine enhances recovery after thoracoscopic surgery by improving analgesia, reducing PONV and opioid use, stabilizing hemodynamics, and promoting overall recovery quality. It should be considered within multimodal ERAS protocols. Further standardized RCTs are warranted to optimize dosing and assess long-term benefits.

BMC AnesthesiologyVol. 26(1)
Jinhua Central Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.