The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, treatment, and overall survival

PURPOSE: We examined the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and screening, treatment, and overall survival for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer in Manitoba, Canada. METHODS: We used population-based data and a quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time series analysis to examine the number of screening mammograms, first treatment rates, and 2-year overall survival prior to and after COVID-19 for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in screening mammograms 2 years after the start of the pandemic (ratio = 0.73%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.58, 0.89). From April to June 2020, fewer individuals diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer had surgery (ratio = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33, 1.07). Fewer individuals diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer had radiotherapy (RT) (ratio = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53, 0.91). RT factions per person-year were lower (ratio = 0.81, 95% CI 0.71, 0.92, April to June 2020 and 0.60, 95% CI 0.56, 0.66, July 2020 to December 2022). The proportion of individuals with stage I-III ER+ /HER2- breast cancer who had hormone therapy (HT) was lower (ratio = 0.55, 95% CI 0.36, 0.84). The proportion of individuals with stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ratio = 3.64, 95% CI 1.18, 11.16) or targeted therapy (ratio = 3.34, 95% CI 1.13, 9.84) was higher. The proportion of individuals who had adjuvant chemotherapy (ratio = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.47, April to June 2020 and ratio = 0.19, 95% CI 0.08, 0.48, January to December 2022), targeted therapy (ratio = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.45, April to June 2020 and ratio = 0.18, 95% CI 0.07, 0.45 January to December 2022), or HT (ratio = 0.43, 95% CI 0.22, 0.83) was lower. The proportion of individuals with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher (ratio = 2.92, 95% CI 1.04, 8.17). There was no difference for any treatment for stage IV breast cancers. There was no difference in 2-year overall survival for stage I-III or stage IV breast cancers. CONCLUSION: In Manitoba, Canada, there was a significant decrease in the number of screening mammograms 2 years after the start of the pandemic. Breast cancer treatment changed in accordance with updated guidelines with no impact on 2-year overall survival.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-026-07943-3
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, treatment, and overall survival

Oliver Bucher, Grace Musto, Marshall Pitz, Allison Feely et al.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer screening, treatment, and overall survival

Oliver Bucher, Grace Musto, Marshall Pitz, Allison Feely, Julian O. Kim, Pamela Hebbard, Piotr Czaykowski, Pascal Lambert, Kathleen Decker, Harminder Singh
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and screening, treatment, and overall survival for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer in Manitoba, Canada. METHODS: We used population-based data and a quasi-experimental study with an interrupted time series analysis to examine the number of screening mammograms, first treatment rates, and 2-year overall survival prior to and after COVID-19 for individuals diagnosed with breast cancer. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in screening mammograms 2 years after the start of the pandemic (ratio = 0.73%, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.58, 0.89). From April to June 2020, fewer individuals diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer had surgery (ratio = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33, 1.07). Fewer individuals diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer had radiotherapy (RT) (ratio = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53, 0.91). RT factions per person-year were lower (ratio = 0.81, 95% CI 0.71, 0.92, April to June 2020 and 0.60, 95% CI 0.56, 0.66, July 2020 to December 2022). The proportion of individuals with stage I-III ER+ /HER2- breast cancer who had hormone therapy (HT) was lower (ratio = 0.55, 95% CI 0.36, 0.84). The proportion of individuals with stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ratio = 3.64, 95% CI 1.18, 11.16) or targeted therapy (ratio = 3.34, 95% CI 1.13, 9.84) was higher. The proportion of individuals who had adjuvant chemotherapy (ratio = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.47, April to June 2020 and ratio = 0.19, 95% CI 0.08, 0.48, January to December 2022), targeted therapy (ratio = 0.14, 95% CI 0.04, 0.45, April to June 2020 and ratio = 0.18, 95% CI 0.07, 0.45 January to December 2022), or HT (ratio = 0.43, 95% CI 0.22, 0.83) was lower. The proportion of individuals with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer who had neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher (ratio = 2.92, 95% CI 1.04, 8.17). There was no difference for any treatment for stage IV breast cancers. There was no difference in 2-year overall survival for stage I-III or stage IV breast cancers. CONCLUSION: In Manitoba, Canada, there was a significant decrease in the number of screening mammograms 2 years after the start of the pandemic. Breast cancer treatment changed in accordance with updated guidelines with no impact on 2-year overall survival.

Breast Cancer Research and TreatmentVol. 217(1)
Manitoba Health (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), CancerCare Manitoba (CA), Research Institute in Oncology and Hematology (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Research Manitoba, CancerCare Manitoba Foundation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.