Comprehensive investigation of single track characteristics in laser powder bed fusion of IN625 via absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy

This work introduces and validates an absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy N E η , a single thermophysical metric that predicts track geometry and defect formation in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of IN625 and enables direct process window selection and optimization. Absorptivity η ∈ [ 0 . 33 , 0 . 88 ] is calibrated in situ from the dimensionless penetration depth δ ∗ = D / ( 2 ω ) , allowing consistent N E η assignment across 23 power–speed ( P – v ) pairs (150 W to 350 W; 288 mm s -1 to 4356 mm s -1 ) after 75 preconditioning layers. Single-track responses are comprehensively characterized and mapped to N E η : surface profilometry quantifies roughness R a ; X-ray computed tomography (XCT) resolves pore size, morphology, and spatial distribution; and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) maps microstructural features. Clear mode thresholds are established: balling ( N E η < 5 ) , conduction ( 5 ≤ N E η < 10 ) , stable keyhole ( 10 ≤ N E η ≤ 13 ) , and the onset of instability ( N E η ≳ 13 ) . Within the conduction–stable-keyhole range, R a decreases monotonically. In contrast, beyond the instability threshold, XCT reveals a transition from sparse, near-circular pores to larger, irregular defects (areas up to 1860 µm 2 ) concentrated near the keyhole root. Rank correlations (Kendall τ ) confirm trends with N E η : depth 0.83, width 0.59, and roughness R a − 0 . 45 . By collapsing melt pool responses across disparate P – v pairs, the validated N E η framework reproduces track cross-sections under iso- N E η conditions and enables parameter selection to meet geometry and porosity targets. The reported Surface Profilometry/XCT metrics and calibrated thresholds provide immediately actionable guidance for process mapping and qualification of IN625, and the methodology is transferable to other LPBF alloys. • Absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy N E η predicts LPBF track geometry. • η calibrated in situ from penetration depth ∗ ; 0.33–0.88 across 23 P – v pairs. • Actionable N E η thresholds: balling < 5; conduction 5 ≤ N E η < 10; stable keyhole 10 ≤ N E η ≤ 13 . • Iso-NE design: distinct P – v pairs reproduce geometry and roughness. • Multi-modal validation (profilometry, XCT, EBSD); pores up to 1860 μ m 2 at high N E η .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.03.257
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive investigation of single track characteristics in laser powder bed fusion of IN625 via absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy

Haydar Güneş, Akın Orhangül, Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamcı et al.
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Comprehensive investigation of single track characteristics in laser powder bed fusion of IN625 via absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy

Haydar Güneş, Akın Orhangül, Rahmi Ünal, Metin U. Salamcı, Mahdi Alishavandi
article en

Abstract

This work introduces and validates an absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy N E η , a single thermophysical metric that predicts track geometry and defect formation in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of IN625 and enables direct process window selection and optimization. Absorptivity η ∈ [ 0 . 33 , 0 . 88 ] is calibrated in situ from the dimensionless penetration depth δ ∗ = D / ( 2 ω ) , allowing consistent N E η assignment across 23 power–speed ( P – v ) pairs (150 W to 350 W; 288 mm s -1 to 4356 mm s -1 ) after 75 preconditioning layers. Single-track responses are comprehensively characterized and mapped to N E η : surface profilometry quantifies roughness R a ; X-ray computed tomography (XCT) resolves pore size, morphology, and spatial distribution; and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) maps microstructural features. Clear mode thresholds are established: balling ( N E η < 5 ) , conduction ( 5 ≤ N E η < 10 ) , stable keyhole ( 10 ≤ N E η ≤ 13 ) , and the onset of instability ( N E η ≳ 13 ) . Within the conduction–stable-keyhole range, R a decreases monotonically. In contrast, beyond the instability threshold, XCT reveals a transition from sparse, near-circular pores to larger, irregular defects (areas up to 1860 µm 2 ) concentrated near the keyhole root. Rank correlations (Kendall τ ) confirm trends with N E η : depth 0.83, width 0.59, and roughness R a − 0 . 45 . By collapsing melt pool responses across disparate P – v pairs, the validated N E η framework reproduces track cross-sections under iso- N E η conditions and enables parameter selection to meet geometry and porosity targets. The reported Surface Profilometry/XCT metrics and calibrated thresholds provide immediately actionable guidance for process mapping and qualification of IN625, and the methodology is transferable to other LPBF alloys. • Absorptivity-calibrated normalized enthalpy N E η predicts LPBF track geometry. • η calibrated in situ from penetration depth ∗ ; 0.33–0.88 across 23 P – v pairs. • Actionable N E η thresholds: balling < 5; conduction 5 ≤ N E η < 10; stable keyhole 10 ≤ N E η ≤ 13 . • Iso-NE design: distinct P – v pairs reproduce geometry and roughness. • Multi-modal validation (profilometry, XCT, EBSD); pores up to 1860 μ m 2 at high N E η .

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 42
Eskisehir Technical University (TR), Turkish Aerospace Industries (Turkey) (TR), Gazi University (TR)
European Commission, Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.