3D PRINTING IN PHARMACEUTICALS FOR PERSONALIZED AND PATIENT-CENTRIC DRUG DELIVERY

Additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, has attracted sustained interest in pharmaceutical research as a potential platform for patient-centric and personalized drug delivery. Unlike conventional batch manufacturing, 3D printing enables digitally driven fabri-cation of dosage forms with controlled dose strength, geometry, internal architecture, and drug-release behaviour. While these attributes offer clear conceptual advantages, their translation in-to routine pharmaceutical practice remains limited and warrants critical evaluation. This review provides a comparative and formulation-focused analysis of the major 3D printing technol-ogies investigated for pharmaceutical applications, including fused deposition modelling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and powder-based binder jetting. Particular emphasis is placed on formulation requirements, material constraints, process-inducedstability concerns, and suitability for specific dosage forms. Among the available techniques, powder-based and extrusion-based approaches demonstrate broader applicability for immedi-ate- and modified-release tablets, Oro dispersible systems, implants, and fixed-dose combina-tion products such as polypills. Despite the regulatory approval of the first 3D-printed medi-cine in 2015, clinical and commercial translation has largely remained at the proof-of-concept stage. Key limitations include the narrow range of pharmaceutically acceptable printable ma-terials, drug–excipient compatibility and thermal degradation risks, challenges in achieving scalable and reproducible manufacturing, and the absence of harmonized regulatory and qual-ity-control frameworks. By integrating recent advances with a critical appraisal of these unre-solved barriers, this review clarifies the realistic potential of pharmaceutical 3D printing and outlines key considerations required for its integration into mainstream drug development.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19331234
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

3D PRINTING IN PHARMACEUTICALS FOR PERSONALIZED AND PATIENT-CENTRIC DRUG DELIVERY

Blessye Alluri1, Abhay Kumar1, Divyanjali Aitham1, Deepika Akulapalleswar1, Vaishnavi Azmera1, Surisetty Sridevi1*
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

3D PRINTING IN PHARMACEUTICALS FOR PERSONALIZED AND PATIENT-CENTRIC DRUG DELIVERY

Blessye Alluri1, Abhay Kumar1, Divyanjali Aitham1, Deepika Akulapalleswar1, Vaishnavi Azmera1, Surisetty Sridevi1*
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing, commonly referred to as three-dimensional (3D) printing, has attracted sustained interest in pharmaceutical research as a potential platform for patient-centric and personalized drug delivery. Unlike conventional batch manufacturing, 3D printing enables digitally driven fabri-cation of dosage forms with controlled dose strength, geometry, internal architecture, and drug-release behaviour. While these attributes offer clear conceptual advantages, their translation in-to routine pharmaceutical practice remains limited and warrants critical evaluation. This review provides a comparative and formulation-focused analysis of the major 3D printing technol-ogies investigated for pharmaceutical applications, including fused deposition modelling (FDM), semi-solid extrusion (SSE), stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), and powder-based binder jetting. Particular emphasis is placed on formulation requirements, material constraints, process-inducedstability concerns, and suitability for specific dosage forms. Among the available techniques, powder-based and extrusion-based approaches demonstrate broader applicability for immedi-ate- and modified-release tablets, Oro dispersible systems, implants, and fixed-dose combina-tion products such as polypills. Despite the regulatory approval of the first 3D-printed medi-cine in 2015, clinical and commercial translation has largely remained at the proof-of-concept stage. Key limitations include the narrow range of pharmaceutically acceptable printable ma-terials, drug–excipient compatibility and thermal degradation risks, challenges in achieving scalable and reproducible manufacturing, and the absence of harmonized regulatory and qual-ity-control frameworks. By integrating recent advances with a critical appraisal of these unre-solved barriers, this review clarifies the realistic potential of pharmaceutical 3D printing and outlines key considerations required for its integration into mainstream drug development.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

3D PRINTING IN PHARMACEUTICALS FOR PERSONALIZED AND PATIENT-CENTRIC DRUG DELIVERY — Blessye Alluri1, Abhay Kumar1, Divyanjali Aitham1, Deepika Akulapalleswar1, Vaishnavi Azmera1, Surisetty Sridevi1* · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS