META-ANALYSIS OF KSHARA SUTRA, LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY AND STAPLED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS (ARSHA)

Introdction: Hemorrhoidal disease, a common anorectal condition, can be managed through various treatment modalities, including Kshara Sutra, Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, and Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy (SH). The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy of Kshara Sutra with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and SH in terms of postoperative outcomes, including pain, complications, recurrence rates, and recovery time. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from 2000 to 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing Kshara Sutra with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty or Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoidal disease treatment. A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with data extracted on baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes. The quality of studies was assessed using the JADAD composite scale and CARE checklist. Results: The review identified 20 studies comparing Kshara Sutra, Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, and SH. Key findings indicated that Kshara Sutra, particularly Apamarga Kshara Sutra, was a viable alternative to SH, demonstrating lower costs, fewer complications, and faster recovery times. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty also showed promising results with quicker recovery and fewer complications compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative outcomes, such as pain, recurrence rates, and recovery time, favored Kshara Sutra and Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty over traditional SH. The quality of studies varied, with most trials lacking randomization and blinding, which may have influenced the results. Conclusion: Kshara Sutra and Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty offer effective alternatives to Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, with advantages in terms of cost, recovery time, and complication rates. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions regarding their comparative efficacy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19325876
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

META-ANALYSIS OF KSHARA SUTRA, LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY AND STAPLED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS (ARSHA)

Dr. Shivam Sharma*1
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

META-ANALYSIS OF KSHARA SUTRA, LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY AND STAPLED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS (ARSHA)

Dr. Shivam Sharma*1
article en

Abstract

Introdction: Hemorrhoidal disease, a common anorectal condition, can be managed through various treatment modalities, including Kshara Sutra, Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, and Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy (SH). The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy of Kshara Sutra with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and SH in terms of postoperative outcomes, including pain, complications, recurrence rates, and recovery time. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from 2000 to 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on studies comparing Kshara Sutra with Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty or Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoidal disease treatment. A total of 20 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with data extracted on baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes. The quality of studies was assessed using the JADAD composite scale and CARE checklist. Results: The review identified 20 studies comparing Kshara Sutra, Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, and SH. Key findings indicated that Kshara Sutra, particularly Apamarga Kshara Sutra, was a viable alternative to SH, demonstrating lower costs, fewer complications, and faster recovery times. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty also showed promising results with quicker recovery and fewer complications compared to conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Postoperative outcomes, such as pain, recurrence rates, and recovery time, favored Kshara Sutra and Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty over traditional SH. The quality of studies varied, with most trials lacking randomization and blinding, which may have influenced the results. Conclusion: Kshara Sutra and Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty offer effective alternatives to Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, with advantages in terms of cost, recovery time, and complication rates. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish definitive conclusions regarding their comparative efficacy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

META-ANALYSIS OF KSHARA SUTRA, LASER HEMORRHOIDOPLASTY AND STAPLED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS (ARSHA) — Dr. Shivam Sharma*1 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS