Impossible Balancing Act? Teaching Interfaith Dialogue through Humility, Compassion, and Justice

In this paper, I am concerned with three key questions:1. Why are the values of humility, compassion, and justice so essential and destabilizing in interfaith dialogues, especially in times of peace?2. Why should teaching interfaith dialogue always provide space for the grievances on all sides from past, present (and possibly) future unrest and conflict?3. How do interfaith dialogue participants in post-conflict settings balance the desire and need for justice with compassion and humility for one’s self, one’s community, and the community in conflict?To begin to answer these questions, I will first reflect upon the role, limits, and relationships between these three virtues before turning to the aims and goals of teaching these virtues in the context of interfaith dialogue. At issue is whether the failure to embody compassion and humility through interfaith dialogue in times of relative peace and prosperity signal the impossibility or meaninglessness of such dialogue when passions are rife, stakes are high, and vulnerability, rage, and hopelessness abound.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPISTÉMÈ
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38119/cacs.2026.37.2
Primary Topic
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impossible Balancing Act? Teaching Interfaith Dialogue through Humility, Compassion, and Justice

Peter Admirand
EPISTÉMÈ
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
article

Impossible Balancing Act? Teaching Interfaith Dialogue through Humility, Compassion, and Justice

Peter Admirand
article en

Abstract

In this paper, I am concerned with three key questions:1. Why are the values of humility, compassion, and justice so essential and destabilizing in interfaith dialogues, especially in times of peace?2. Why should teaching interfaith dialogue always provide space for the grievances on all sides from past, present (and possibly) future unrest and conflict?3. How do interfaith dialogue participants in post-conflict settings balance the desire and need for justice with compassion and humility for one’s self, one’s community, and the community in conflict?To begin to answer these questions, I will first reflect upon the role, limits, and relationships between these three virtues before turning to the aims and goals of teaching these virtues in the context of interfaith dialogue. At issue is whether the failure to embody compassion and humility through interfaith dialogue in times of relative peace and prosperity signal the impossibility or meaninglessness of such dialogue when passions are rife, stakes are high, and vulnerability, rage, and hopelessness abound.

EPISTÉMÈVol. 37(0)
Dublin City University (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Karl Barth and Christian Theology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impossible Balancing Act? Teaching Interfaith Dialogue through Humility, Compassion, and Justice — Peter Admirand · EPISTÉMÈ (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS