Correction to “Field Applicability of Cognitive–Motor Dual-Task Assessment in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Psychometric, Physiological, and Translational Frameworks”

contained wording that may be overgeneralized or imply broader representativeness than supported by the data, including certain expressions in Table 2 and related descriptions in the text.The author apologizes for any confusion or inconvenience this may have caused and appreciates your understanding.First of all, three changes were made in the main text, in the Results section and the Discussion section.In the Results section, replace "(ICC0.8-0.96,SRM 0.9, setup<20 min)" with "(ICC0.8-0.96)" in the 'Overview of evidence across outcome domains' item. Before modificationAcross all decades, behavioral reaction-time indices and IMUbased kinematic outcomes provided the strongest psychometric evidence (ICC0.8-0.96,SRM 0.9, setup<20 min). After modificationAcross all decades, behavioral reaction-time indices and IMUbased kinematic outcomes provided the strongest psychometric evidence (ICC0.8-0.96).In the Discussion section, delete "(SRM 0.95)" from the 'Responsiveness' item.