Who Are You Taking to the PROM? Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Evaluation in a FELD Cohort

Background: Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) is one of the latest surgical techniques developed for discectomy in the lumbar spine. It is considered a truly minimally invasive procedure with results at least equal to previous techniques regarding decreasing disability and improving quality of life with an acceptable rate of complications [1, 2]. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent a FELD procedure with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and clinical findings. Of 147 patients who had a FELD procedure between 2013 and 2018, 86 answered the follow-up SweSpine PROMs, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ5D and EQ5D VAS and were enrolled in this study. FELD patients attended a clinical examination after a mean time of 4.3 years and answered a specific questionnaire. The clinical examination included Lasegue’s test, calf muscle hypotrophy, and muscle weakness in 52 patients who attended the examination. Results: An improvement was found in ODI (from 43.5 to 14.8) and EQ-VAS (48 to 73.7). Despite the high incidence of numbness (60%) and weakness (52%), patients graded their overall satisfaction with the surgery at a mean rate of 7.55 (SD=2.8) on a 0-10 scale. 80 % of the patients would recommend FELD surgery. 83% percent of the patients reported being pain-free regarding Low Back Pain (LBP) and 87% for leg pain at the follow-up. However, a change in work assignments due to back-related problems occurred in 45% of cases. Provokable pain, defined as the ability to elicit back or leg pain through heavy lifting, static standing, running, etc, was described by 65% and 53.3% respectively. Conclusion: The main findings of this study are that patients who underwent FELD reported a high overall satisfaction rate of 7.55 on a scale of 10 and a significant improvement in PROMs despite high rates of numbness and hyperalgesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/jsp.v5i2.18191
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Are You Taking to the PROM? Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Evaluation in a FELD Cohort

Olof Westin, Mikael Klingenstierna, Joel Beck, Adad Baranto et al.
Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Who Are You Taking to the PROM? Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Evaluation in a FELD Cohort

Olof Westin, Mikael Klingenstierna, Joel Beck, Adad Baranto, Gabriel Dalén, Enki Anton Baranto
article en

Abstract

Background: Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) is one of the latest surgical techniques developed for discectomy in the lumbar spine. It is considered a truly minimally invasive procedure with results at least equal to previous techniques regarding decreasing disability and improving quality of life with an acceptable rate of complications [1, 2]. Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent a FELD procedure with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) and clinical findings. Of 147 patients who had a FELD procedure between 2013 and 2018, 86 answered the follow-up SweSpine PROMs, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EQ5D and EQ5D VAS and were enrolled in this study. FELD patients attended a clinical examination after a mean time of 4.3 years and answered a specific questionnaire. The clinical examination included Lasegue’s test, calf muscle hypotrophy, and muscle weakness in 52 patients who attended the examination. Results: An improvement was found in ODI (from 43.5 to 14.8) and EQ-VAS (48 to 73.7). Despite the high incidence of numbness (60%) and weakness (52%), patients graded their overall satisfaction with the surgery at a mean rate of 7.55 (SD=2.8) on a 0-10 scale. 80 % of the patients would recommend FELD surgery. 83% percent of the patients reported being pain-free regarding Low Back Pain (LBP) and 87% for leg pain at the follow-up. However, a change in work assignments due to back-related problems occurred in 45% of cases. Provokable pain, defined as the ability to elicit back or leg pain through heavy lifting, static standing, running, etc, was described by 65% and 53.3% respectively. Conclusion: The main findings of this study are that patients who underwent FELD reported a high overall satisfaction rate of 7.55 on a scale of 10 and a significant improvement in PROMs despite high rates of numbness and hyperalgesia.

Journal of Spine Practice (JSP)Vol. 5(2)
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.