Detecting Sparks from Hot Work Using a Convolutional Neural Network

This thesis investigates the problem of detecting sparks created by hot work using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). A dataset is collected for this specific task, using different spark generators, light levels, and distances. The original captured dataset was cropped to create a second dataset with relatively larger sparks. Using these datasets, 6 different models were trained to investigate if pre-training on different datasets would improve accuracy. The results from training are presented, with the best model trained on the cropped dataset correctly identifying sparks an average of 56.4% of the time, and the best model trained on the original dataset correctly identifying sparks an average of 24.1% of the time. The results are discussed, highlighting differences between the datasets and the impact of pre-training. The models are then tested on videos outside of the gathered dataset, and common sources of error are identified and discussed. The discussion is rounded off with a few notes on industrial applications.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Image Enhancement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting Sparks from Hot Work Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Erik Bergelin
KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Image Enhancement Techniques
article

Detecting Sparks from Hot Work Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Erik Bergelin
article en

Abstract

This thesis investigates the problem of detecting sparks created by hot work using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). A dataset is collected for this specific task, using different spark generators, light levels, and distances. The original captured dataset was cropped to create a second dataset with relatively larger sparks. Using these datasets, 6 different models were trained to investigate if pre-training on different datasets would improve accuracy. The results from training are presented, with the best model trained on the cropped dataset correctly identifying sparks an average of 56.4% of the time, and the best model trained on the original dataset correctly identifying sparks an average of 24.1% of the time. The results are discussed, highlighting differences between the datasets and the impact of pre-training. The models are then tested on videos outside of the gathered dataset, and common sources of error are identified and discussed. The discussion is rounded off with a few notes on industrial applications.

KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Image Enhancement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detecting Sparks from Hot Work Using a Convolutional Neural Network — Erik Bergelin · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS