Reducing Rape Myth Acceptance Through Educational Debunking

Reducing rape myth acceptance (RMA) is essential to improve the treatment of victims and challenge the societal narratives that excuse sexual aggression. This study examined whether an educational intervention providing myth-debunking information could effectively reduce RMA. Participants first completed a pre-test assessing their agreement with a series of rape myth statements. They were then randomly assigned to either an educational intervention group, which received information designed to challenge common rape myths, or a control group, which received unrelated scientific content. RMA was reassessed immediately after the intervention (post-test) and again after a 2-week delay (follow-up). Results showed that participants in the intervention group exhibited a meaningful reduction in RMA scores both immediately and at follow-up, compared with the control group. These findings suggest that providing concise, evidence-based information may be an effective tool to reduce RMA over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261429561
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reducing Rape Myth Acceptance Through Educational Debunking

Henry Otgaar, Irena Bošković, Charlotte A. Bücken, Ivan Mangiulli et al.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Reducing Rape Myth Acceptance Through Educational Debunking

Henry Otgaar, Irena Bošković, Charlotte A. Bücken, Ivan Mangiulli, Ellen Katharina Kreuer
article en

Abstract

Reducing rape myth acceptance (RMA) is essential to improve the treatment of victims and challenge the societal narratives that excuse sexual aggression. This study examined whether an educational intervention providing myth-debunking information could effectively reduce RMA. Participants first completed a pre-test assessing their agreement with a series of rape myth statements. They were then randomly assigned to either an educational intervention group, which received information designed to challenge common rape myths, or a control group, which received unrelated scientific content. RMA was reassessed immediately after the intervention (post-test) and again after a 2-week delay (follow-up). Results showed that participants in the intervention group exhibited a meaningful reduction in RMA scores both immediately and at follow-up, compared with the control group. These findings suggest that providing concise, evidence-based information may be an effective tool to reduce RMA over time.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of Novi Sad (RS), Maastricht University (NL), Institut National de Criminalistique et de Criminologie (BE), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL), KU Leuven (BE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.