Long-acting injectable vs. oral antipsychotics during electroconvulsive therapy in psychosis: a retrospective comparative study

Psychoses are often characterized by relapse and treatment resistance. Patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) represent a high-risk subgroup. Although long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics improve adherence compared with oral formulations, studies regarding their effectiveness when combined with ECT remain limited. Our study compared clinical outcomes between LAI and oral antipsychotics administered during ECT to patients with psychosis. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 65 patients, grouped according to antipsychotic formulation. Treatment response was defined by improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale. Symptom changes were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The LAI-ECT group showed a significantly higher response rate compared with the oral-ECT group (72.7 vs. 37.5%, P = 0.004). In multivariable analyses, LAI use remained significantly associated with treatment response (P = 0.007). In the subgroup analysis of 48 patients, the LAI-ECT group exhibited greater reductions in total PANSS scores (P = 0.014), which remained significant after adjustment for baseline severity (P = 0.034). Greater symptom reductions were observed in the PANSS negative and general psychopathology subscales. These findings suggest an association between concurrent LAI antipsychotic administration during ECT and clinical outcomes, warranting further prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2026-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/yic.0000000000000621
Primary Topic
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-acting injectable vs. oral antipsychotics during electroconvulsive therapy in psychosis: a retrospective comparative study

Soo‐Young Bhang, Hyoseok Kang, E. Kim, J. Richard Choi et al.
International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
article

Long-acting injectable vs. oral antipsychotics during electroconvulsive therapy in psychosis: a retrospective comparative study

Soo‐Young Bhang, Hyoseok Kang, E. Kim, J. Richard Choi, Yong Sik Kim, Kyu Young Lee, Hee Won Jeong, Jae Hoon Jeong
article en

Abstract

Psychoses are often characterized by relapse and treatment resistance. Patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) represent a high-risk subgroup. Although long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics improve adherence compared with oral formulations, studies regarding their effectiveness when combined with ECT remain limited. Our study compared clinical outcomes between LAI and oral antipsychotics administered during ECT to patients with psychosis. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 65 patients, grouped according to antipsychotic formulation. Treatment response was defined by improvement on the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale. Symptom changes were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The LAI-ECT group showed a significantly higher response rate compared with the oral-ECT group (72.7 vs. 37.5%, P = 0.004). In multivariable analyses, LAI use remained significantly associated with treatment response (P = 0.007). In the subgroup analysis of 48 patients, the LAI-ECT group exhibited greater reductions in total PANSS scores (P = 0.014), which remained significant after adjustment for baseline severity (P = 0.034). Greater symptom reductions were observed in the PANSS negative and general psychopathology subscales. These findings suggest an association between concurrent LAI antipsychotic administration during ECT and clinical outcomes, warranting further prospective validation.

International Clinical Psychopharmacology
Eulji University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.