THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THERMODYNAMIC-RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of the text DK-RD2: A Thermodynamic–Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Cosmic Expansion, by Gabriel Martín del Campo Flores, in confrontation with the T

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of DK-RD2: A Thermodynamic–Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Cosmic Expansion, by Gabriel Martín del Campo Flores, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines the central claim of DK-RD2 that the accelerated expansion of the Universe may be reproduced without dark energy, dark matter, an explicit cosmological constant, or ad hoc free parameters, through an effective gravitational coupling dependent on temperature and relativistic motion. The article evaluates the model in light of the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, especially its Seven Absolute Truths, and investigates both its possible compatibilities and its points of tension. Particular attention is given to the distinction between phenomenic description and ontological foundation, as well as to the articulation of DK-RD2 with phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem of TO, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis argues that DK-RD2 has genuine heuristic and scientific value as a regional physical theory of late cosmological regime, especially regarding the modulation of gravity and the interpretation of cosmic expansion. However, under the modal discipline of TO, it does not by itself attain the status of an ultimate cosmogonic explanation of the Universe. Its strongest philosophical contribution lies in offering a physically grounded description of already manifested cosmic dynamics, which may be reinterpreted within TO as a phenomenic expression of convergence zones, gravitational modulation, and centrifugal exteriorization. By bringing DK-RD2 into dialogue with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal-ontological developments, and a broader support bibliography in relativity, thermodynamics, cosmology, and philosophy of science, this article proposes a disciplined framework for integrating innovative cosmological models into a wider ontological discussion about the origin, structure, and intelligibility of the Universe. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; DK-RD2; thermodynamic-relativistic gravity; cosmic expansion; modal ontology; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; cosmology; origin of the Universe; gravitational modulation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19301673
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THERMODYNAMIC-RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of the text DK-RD2: A Thermodynamic–Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Cosmic Expansion, by Gabriel Martín del Campo Flores, in confrontation with the T

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF THERMODYNAMIC-RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of the text DK-RD2: A Thermodynamic–Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Cosmic Expansion, by Gabriel Martín del Campo Flores, in confrontation with the T

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of DK-RD2: A Thermodynamic–Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Cosmic Expansion, by Gabriel Martín del Campo Flores, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines the central claim of DK-RD2 that the accelerated expansion of the Universe may be reproduced without dark energy, dark matter, an explicit cosmological constant, or ad hoc free parameters, through an effective gravitational coupling dependent on temperature and relativistic motion. The article evaluates the model in light of the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity, especially its Seven Absolute Truths, and investigates both its possible compatibilities and its points of tension. Particular attention is given to the distinction between phenomenic description and ontological foundation, as well as to the articulation of DK-RD2 with phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, the cosmogonic theorem of TO, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. The analysis argues that DK-RD2 has genuine heuristic and scientific value as a regional physical theory of late cosmological regime, especially regarding the modulation of gravity and the interpretation of cosmic expansion. However, under the modal discipline of TO, it does not by itself attain the status of an ultimate cosmogonic explanation of the Universe. Its strongest philosophical contribution lies in offering a physically grounded description of already manifested cosmic dynamics, which may be reinterpreted within TO as a phenomenic expression of convergence zones, gravitational modulation, and centrifugal exteriorization. By bringing DK-RD2 into dialogue with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal-ontological developments, and a broader support bibliography in relativity, thermodynamics, cosmology, and philosophy of science, this article proposes a disciplined framework for integrating innovative cosmological models into a wider ontological discussion about the origin, structure, and intelligibility of the Universe. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; DK-RD2; thermodynamic-relativistic gravity; cosmic expansion; modal ontology; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; cosmology; origin of the Universe; gravitational modulation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.