Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarking and a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model

Abstract Prediction of a compound’s toxicity is a key step toward realizing animal-free testing of chemical compounds. Recent advances have yielded significant progress in computational toxicity prediction, including machine learning methods that utilize chemical fingerprints and deep learning-based latent representations. However, challenges remain, primarily due to the lack of clean training datasets and the inconsistent model performance. To address these challenges, we curated a comprehensive dataset of aquatic toxicity from seven data sources, which contains 50,603 records for 5,889 compounds across 2,285 different species, much larger than similar datasets used in previous studies. We also developed tox-learn, a Python library featuring tools for automated dataset cleaning, machine learning methods and performance evaluation. The library places special emphasis on avoiding overestimation of prediction accuracy caused by improper train-test data splitting. Based on this toolbox, we benchmarked various predictive models using different train-test splitting strategies on the curated dataset. Our results showed that the choice of machine learning method, molecular fingerprint, and train-test splitting strategy all significantly affect performance. We demonstrated that incorporating species information generally improved predictions, although the degree of improvement depended on how this information was represented. In addition, we developed a new 3D structure–based deep-learning model, 3DMol-Tox, which achieves regression accuracy comparable to the best 2D-structure based model (GPBoost) while exhibiting consistently higher within-one-bin (W1B) classification accuracy. Finally, we analyzed the impact of different train–test splitting strategies and provide recommendations based on our benchmarking, such as using structure-aware splitting to mitigate information leakage, a common issue that inflates reported model performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag081
Primary Topic
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarking and a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model

Ruying Yuan, Haixu Tang, Yuzhen Ye, Joseph Shaw
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
article

Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarking and a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model

Ruying Yuan, Haixu Tang, Yuzhen Ye, Joseph Shaw
article en

Abstract

Abstract Prediction of a compound’s toxicity is a key step toward realizing animal-free testing of chemical compounds. Recent advances have yielded significant progress in computational toxicity prediction, including machine learning methods that utilize chemical fingerprints and deep learning-based latent representations. However, challenges remain, primarily due to the lack of clean training datasets and the inconsistent model performance. To address these challenges, we curated a comprehensive dataset of aquatic toxicity from seven data sources, which contains 50,603 records for 5,889 compounds across 2,285 different species, much larger than similar datasets used in previous studies. We also developed tox-learn, a Python library featuring tools for automated dataset cleaning, machine learning methods and performance evaluation. The library places special emphasis on avoiding overestimation of prediction accuracy caused by improper train-test data splitting. Based on this toolbox, we benchmarked various predictive models using different train-test splitting strategies on the curated dataset. Our results showed that the choice of machine learning method, molecular fingerprint, and train-test splitting strategy all significantly affect performance. We demonstrated that incorporating species information generally improved predictions, although the degree of improvement depended on how this information was represented. In addition, we developed a new 3D structure–based deep-learning model, 3DMol-Tox, which achieves regression accuracy comparable to the best 2D-structure based model (GPBoost) while exhibiting consistently higher within-one-bin (W1B) classification accuracy. Finally, we analyzed the impact of different train–test splitting strategies and provide recommendations based on our benchmarking, such as using structure-aware splitting to mitigate information leakage, a common issue that inflates reported model performance.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Computational Drug Discovery Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cross-chemical and cross-species toxicity prediction: benchmarking and a novel 3D-structure-based deep learning model — Ruying Yuan, Haixu Tang, et al. · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS