Enhanced setup and positioning accuracy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization approach

Abstract Objective To determine whether a customized cushion/mask/bite-block (CMB) immobilization strategy was superior to the standard head and neck immobilization system in terms of enhancing setup and positioning accuracy across diverse anatomical planes during IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods This study analyzed CBCT images of 22 patients undergoing IMRT for NPC, assessing setup errors at distinct anatomical levels (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, mandible) and calculating corresponding CTV-PTV margin expansions. Intra-fractional positional uncertainties were also evaluated. Differences in setup errors, required PTV margins and intra-fractional positional accuracy were compared between the two groups. Results The CMB group showed significant improvement in inter-fractional setup error within the ROI for PTV compared to the standard headrest group. Compared with the standard headrest group, the CMB group significantly reduced systematic and random errors, especially in the X (left-right) and Y (superior-inferior) directions. The respective systematic and random errors (mm) were as follows: X (0.73 ± 0.98 vs. 1.16 ± 0.99), Y (1.12 ± 0.86 vs. 1.70 ± 0.96), and Z (0.86 ± 1.12 vs. 0.85 ± 1.14). Furthermore, the CMB group significantly improved the positional repeatability of various local ROIs (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, and mandible). Additionally, the CMB group had reduced CTV-PTV margin expansions in the three directions. Conclusion Compared to the standard headrest group, the CMB immobilization protocol significantly improved setup and positioning accuracy for IMRT in NPC patients, reducing the need for PTV margin expansion across various anatomical levels. This novel immobilization approach was deemed effective, simple, and robust during IMRT for NPC. Advances in knowledge This study provides valuable clinical insights into improving setup and positioning accuracy at various anatomical levels during IMRT for NPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Radiology
Published
2026-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf317
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhanced setup and positioning accuracy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization approach

Bo Wan, F. Huan, Rui Wu, Xinliang Zhang et al.
British Journal of Radiology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Enhanced setup and positioning accuracy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A customized cushion/mask/bite-block immobilization approach

Bo Wan, F. Huan, Rui Wu, Xinliang Zhang, Ke Zhou, Junlin Yi, Songsong Geng, Gengqiang Zhu, Yanxin Zhang, Yang Liu, Yichen Hou
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To determine whether a customized cushion/mask/bite-block (CMB) immobilization strategy was superior to the standard head and neck immobilization system in terms of enhancing setup and positioning accuracy across diverse anatomical planes during IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods This study analyzed CBCT images of 22 patients undergoing IMRT for NPC, assessing setup errors at distinct anatomical levels (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, mandible) and calculating corresponding CTV-PTV margin expansions. Intra-fractional positional uncertainties were also evaluated. Differences in setup errors, required PTV margins and intra-fractional positional accuracy were compared between the two groups. Results The CMB group showed significant improvement in inter-fractional setup error within the ROI for PTV compared to the standard headrest group. Compared with the standard headrest group, the CMB group significantly reduced systematic and random errors, especially in the X (left-right) and Y (superior-inferior) directions. The respective systematic and random errors (mm) were as follows: X (0.73 ± 0.98 vs. 1.16 ± 0.99), Y (1.12 ± 0.86 vs. 1.70 ± 0.96), and Z (0.86 ± 1.12 vs. 0.85 ± 1.14). Furthermore, the CMB group significantly improved the positional repeatability of various local ROIs (sphenoid, C1, C4, C7, and mandible). Additionally, the CMB group had reduced CTV-PTV margin expansions in the three directions. Conclusion Compared to the standard headrest group, the CMB immobilization protocol significantly improved setup and positioning accuracy for IMRT in NPC patients, reducing the need for PTV margin expansion across various anatomical levels. This novel immobilization approach was deemed effective, simple, and robust during IMRT for NPC. Advances in knowledge This study provides valuable clinical insights into improving setup and positioning accuracy at various anatomical levels during IMRT for NPC.

British Journal of Radiology
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), National Cancer Center (US), Peking University People's Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.