Comparison of Intravascular Imaging–, Physiology‐, or Angiography‐Guided Approaches for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Background Despite current guidelines recommending physiology‐ and intravascular imaging–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in specific lesion subsets, angiography‐guided PCI remains common in practice. The comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of PCI guided by intravascular imaging or physiological assessment versus conventional angiography. Methods We conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials, searching PubMed and EMBASE up to May 31, 2025. Eligible studies compared at least 2 of the following 6 guidance modalities in PCI: angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging, fractional flow reserve, angiography‐derived fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous wave‐free ratio. The primary outcome was trial‐defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a frequentist random‐effects network meta‐analysis. Subgroup analyses assessed clinical presentation and guidance objectives such as decision making and procedural optimization. Results We identified 43 randomized controlled trials involving 39 291 patients. IVUS‐guided PCI (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60–0.79]), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging‐guided PCI (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63–0.90]), and fractional flow reserve–guided PCI (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70–0.95]) were associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with angiography‐guided PCI. Furthermore, IVUS‐guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with instantaneous wave‐free ratio–guided PCI (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55–1.00]). IVUS‐guided PCI reduced the risk of MACE in both acute coronary syndrome and non‐acute coronary syndrome patients. Conclusions IVUS‐ and optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging–guided PCI were superior to angiography‐guided PCI in reducing MACEs. Among the physiology‐based approaches, only fractional flow reserve showed a clear benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.125.046367
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging–, Physiology‐, or Angiography‐Guided Approaches for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Yuko Kiyohara, Hiroki Ueyama, Eric A. Secemsky, Tadao Aikawa et al.
Journal of the American Heart Association
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Comparison of Intravascular Imaging–, Physiology‐, or Angiography‐Guided Approaches for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis

Yuko Kiyohara, Hiroki Ueyama, Eric A. Secemsky, Tadao Aikawa, Roger J. Laham, A. Maehara, Toshiki Kuno, Robert W. Yeh, Hisato Takagi, Tetsuya Saito, Jose Wiley
article en

Abstract

Background Despite current guidelines recommending physiology‐ and intravascular imaging–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in specific lesion subsets, angiography‐guided PCI remains common in practice. The comparative effectiveness of these strategies remains uncertain. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes of PCI guided by intravascular imaging or physiological assessment versus conventional angiography. Methods We conducted a systematic review and network meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials, searching PubMed and EMBASE up to May 31, 2025. Eligible studies compared at least 2 of the following 6 guidance modalities in PCI: angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging, fractional flow reserve, angiography‐derived fractional flow reserve, and instantaneous wave‐free ratio. The primary outcome was trial‐defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a frequentist random‐effects network meta‐analysis. Subgroup analyses assessed clinical presentation and guidance objectives such as decision making and procedural optimization. Results We identified 43 randomized controlled trials involving 39 291 patients. IVUS‐guided PCI (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.60–0.79]), optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging‐guided PCI (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.63–0.90]), and fractional flow reserve–guided PCI (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70–0.95]) were associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with angiography‐guided PCI. Furthermore, IVUS‐guided PCI was associated with a lower risk of MACEs compared with instantaneous wave‐free ratio–guided PCI (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.55–1.00]). IVUS‐guided PCI reduced the risk of MACE in both acute coronary syndrome and non‐acute coronary syndrome patients. Conclusions IVUS‐ and optical coherence tomography/optical frequency domain imaging–guided PCI were superior to angiography‐guided PCI in reducing MACEs. Among the physiology‐based approaches, only fractional flow reserve showed a clear benefit.

Journal of the American Heart Association
Tulane University (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Emory University (US), Hadassah Medical Center (IL), Juntendo University (JP), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Shizuoka Medical Center (JP), Edogawa Hospital (JP), Columbia University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.