Hop response to glufosinate‐based spring pruning and implications for crop and weed management

Abstract Spring pruning of hops ( Humulus lupulus L.) is a critical practice to reduce foliar disease inoculum and control weeds, thereby supporting more profitable hop production. Although paraquat and carfentrazone have been used for spring pruning, the increasing regulatory restrictions on paraquat and the limited weed control efficacy of carfentrazone highlight the need for alternative solutions. This study evaluated glufosinate, a nonselective postemergence herbicide, during spring pruning of hop plants. Four field studies were conducted between 2022 and 2024 in experimental and commercial hop yards located in Washington and Oregon. Treatments included glufosinate applied at 1150 and 2295 g ai ha − 1 , either as a single or two sequential applications, compared to carfentrazone (35 g ai ha − 1 ) and a nontreated control. Sequential applications were made 14 days apart. Across all site‐years, glufosinate consistently provided superior hop basal shoot control, with 14 and 28 days after initial treatment (DAIT) control ranging from 50% to 96% and 34% to 96%, respectively. In contrast, carfentrazone resulted in lower control levels (36%–50% at 14 DAIT; 8%–34% at 28 DAIT). Glufosinate effectively controlled kochia (84%–93% at 28 DAIT), outperforming carfentrazone (<25%). In addition to improved weed and hop shoot control, no negative effects were observed in hop plant height or bine fresh weight at harvest, except in 1‐year‐old hops. These findings support that glufosinate is safe and effective for spring pruning in mature hops, though crop age should be considered to ensure crop safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Science
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.70277
Primary Topic
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hop response to glufosinate‐based spring pruning and implications for crop and weed management

Marcelo L. Moretti, Greeshmanth Alluri
Crop Science
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
article

Hop response to glufosinate‐based spring pruning and implications for crop and weed management

Marcelo L. Moretti, Greeshmanth Alluri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Spring pruning of hops ( Humulus lupulus L.) is a critical practice to reduce foliar disease inoculum and control weeds, thereby supporting more profitable hop production. Although paraquat and carfentrazone have been used for spring pruning, the increasing regulatory restrictions on paraquat and the limited weed control efficacy of carfentrazone highlight the need for alternative solutions. This study evaluated glufosinate, a nonselective postemergence herbicide, during spring pruning of hop plants. Four field studies were conducted between 2022 and 2024 in experimental and commercial hop yards located in Washington and Oregon. Treatments included glufosinate applied at 1150 and 2295 g ai ha − 1 , either as a single or two sequential applications, compared to carfentrazone (35 g ai ha − 1 ) and a nontreated control. Sequential applications were made 14 days apart. Across all site‐years, glufosinate consistently provided superior hop basal shoot control, with 14 and 28 days after initial treatment (DAIT) control ranging from 50% to 96% and 34% to 96%, respectively. In contrast, carfentrazone resulted in lower control levels (36%–50% at 14 DAIT; 8%–34% at 28 DAIT). Glufosinate effectively controlled kochia (84%–93% at 28 DAIT), outperforming carfentrazone (<25%). In addition to improved weed and hop shoot control, no negative effects were observed in hop plant height or bine fresh weight at harvest, except in 1‐year‐old hops. These findings support that glufosinate is safe and effective for spring pruning in mature hops, though crop age should be considered to ensure crop safety.

Crop ScienceVol. 66(2)
Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Hop response to glufosinate‐based spring pruning and implications for crop and weed management — Marcelo L. Moretti, Greeshmanth Alluri · Crop Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS