Does Market Power Fuel the Systemic Stability of Alternative Financial Systems?

ABSTRACT This paper examines the bidirectional relationship between competition and systemic risk in dual financial systems where Islamic and conventional financial institutions operate side by side. Using a sample of publicly listed financial institutions from the Asia‐Pacific, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions from 2000 to 2019, we estimate systemic risk through ΔCoVaR and competition using the Lerner index. Employing a panel vector autoregressive framework, we analyse how this relationship evolves across different economic phases, with particular focus on the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). We find that lower competition is consistently associated with reduced systemic risk, with this effect being stronger—by approximately 25%—in conventional financial institutions. Notably, the competition–risk relationship is asymmetric and time‐varying. Put simply, competition enhances stability pre‐crisis; it amplifies systemic risk during the GFC, especially in the conventional sector. Post‐crisis, this fragility effect persists in conventional institutions but dissipates in Islamic ones. Our findings contribute to the literature on competition, systemic risk, and comparative banking by highlighting how alternative financial models and economic conditions jointly shape financial stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Published
2026-03-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70202
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Market Power Fuel the Systemic Stability of Alternative Financial Systems?

Vasileios Pappas, Abdullah Iqbal, Mohammad Abweny, Aamina Khurram
International Journal of Finance & Economics
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Does Market Power Fuel the Systemic Stability of Alternative Financial Systems?

Vasileios Pappas, Abdullah Iqbal, Mohammad Abweny, Aamina Khurram
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the bidirectional relationship between competition and systemic risk in dual financial systems where Islamic and conventional financial institutions operate side by side. Using a sample of publicly listed financial institutions from the Asia‐Pacific, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions from 2000 to 2019, we estimate systemic risk through ΔCoVaR and competition using the Lerner index. Employing a panel vector autoregressive framework, we analyse how this relationship evolves across different economic phases, with particular focus on the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). We find that lower competition is consistently associated with reduced systemic risk, with this effect being stronger—by approximately 25%—in conventional financial institutions. Notably, the competition–risk relationship is asymmetric and time‐varying. Put simply, competition enhances stability pre‐crisis; it amplifies systemic risk during the GFC, especially in the conventional sector. Post‐crisis, this fragility effect persists in conventional institutions but dissipates in Islamic ones. Our findings contribute to the literature on competition, systemic risk, and comparative banking by highlighting how alternative financial models and economic conditions jointly shape financial stability.

International Journal of Finance & Economics
University of Kent (GB), University of Exeter (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Yarmouk University (JO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.