Understanding Legitimacy Construction Through Online Community Discourse in Megaprojects: evidence from the Lyon–Turin megaproject

• Online community sentiment toward megaprojects is highly event-sensitive and evolves dynamically over time. • Protest events act as powerful amplifiers of legitimacy challenges, strengthening opposition narratives. • Legitimacy dynamics exhibit both intergroup polarization and intragroup fragmentation within online communities. • Negative project sentiment spills over to the promoting organization, weakening organizational legitimacy. • Digital arenas have become critical spaces where project legitimacy is continuously constructed and contested. Legitimacy is a critical condition for the viability of megaprojects, yet little is known about how it is constructed and contested within digital arenas. This study examines the role of online communities in shaping project legitimacy, drawing on the case of the transnational Lyon–Turin high-speed rail project. Using a longitudinal dataset of over 190,000 tweets collected over a 15-year period, we analyze how project-related events, organizational communication, sentiment, engagement, and polarization interact over time. The results show three main findings. First, online legitimacy is highly event-driven: governance, economic, and protest-related events generate statistically significant shifts in community sentiment, with public protests producing the strongest and most consistent effects. Second, online communities exhibit pronounced internal heterogeneity. Rather than responding uniformly, both supporters and opponents display intragroup polarization, revealing fractures and divergent interpretations of the same events. Third, increases in negative sentiment toward the project are associated with reduced engagement with the project-promoting organization, indicating that online disaffection can spill over and undermine organizational legitimacy. This study advances a process-oriented understanding of project legitimacy as contested, fragile, and temporally sensitive. The findings highlight the strategic importance for project-promoting organizations of systematically monitoring online discourse and engaging proactively with digital publics throughout the project lifecycle.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Project Management
Published
2026-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2026.102847
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Legitimacy Construction Through Online Community Discourse in Megaprojects: evidence from the Lyon–Turin megaproject

Marco Mancini, Costanza Mariani, Erik Araya Aliaga
International Journal of Project Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
article

Understanding Legitimacy Construction Through Online Community Discourse in Megaprojects: evidence from the Lyon–Turin megaproject

Marco Mancini, Costanza Mariani, Erik Araya Aliaga
article en

Abstract

• Online community sentiment toward megaprojects is highly event-sensitive and evolves dynamically over time. • Protest events act as powerful amplifiers of legitimacy challenges, strengthening opposition narratives. • Legitimacy dynamics exhibit both intergroup polarization and intragroup fragmentation within online communities. • Negative project sentiment spills over to the promoting organization, weakening organizational legitimacy. • Digital arenas have become critical spaces where project legitimacy is continuously constructed and contested. Legitimacy is a critical condition for the viability of megaprojects, yet little is known about how it is constructed and contested within digital arenas. This study examines the role of online communities in shaping project legitimacy, drawing on the case of the transnational Lyon–Turin high-speed rail project. Using a longitudinal dataset of over 190,000 tweets collected over a 15-year period, we analyze how project-related events, organizational communication, sentiment, engagement, and polarization interact over time. The results show three main findings. First, online legitimacy is highly event-driven: governance, economic, and protest-related events generate statistically significant shifts in community sentiment, with public protests producing the strongest and most consistent effects. Second, online communities exhibit pronounced internal heterogeneity. Rather than responding uniformly, both supporters and opponents display intragroup polarization, revealing fractures and divergent interpretations of the same events. Third, increases in negative sentiment toward the project are associated with reduced engagement with the project-promoting organization, indicating that online disaffection can spill over and undermine organizational legitimacy. This study advances a process-oriented understanding of project legitimacy as contested, fragile, and temporally sensitive. The findings highlight the strategic importance for project-promoting organizations of systematically monitoring online discourse and engaging proactively with digital publics throughout the project lifecycle.

International Journal of Project Management
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Construction Project Management and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.